What Causes global temperature – Quiz

Another fun quiz – but this time, there are no obviously right answers to any of these questions. Instead I’m just interested to see what others think may be the best answers.
(Please note, if there is not the appropriate response – leave a note at the end)

1. How much did global temperatures change from approximately 1900 to the 2000

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2. The average temperature of the earth is about 32C warmer than is calculated for a perfectly conducting black body. What is the main cause of this:

 
 
 
 

3. The average temperature of the earth is about 32C warmer than is calculated for a perfectly conducting black body. What were the secondary causes – or what other effects also had an impact.

 
 
 
 

4. What was the principle cause of changes in global temperature in the last few thousand years before the modern era (i.e. what caused the little ice-age, medieval warm period – but not the ice age)

(Note more than one answer is permitted – but please only pick significant ones.)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

5. Between 1970 and 2000 many datasets show a strong rise in global temperature. What was the principle cause of this

 
 
 
 
 
 

6. You die and meet your maker. They say “I’m fed up will all this stupid argument about my climate … I’m just going to change it once and then it will be the same overall temperature for the next 300 years – WHAT NEW TEMPERATURE WOULD YOU LIKE IT TO BE”.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

7. Please add any notes or comments.


Share
This entry was posted in Climate. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to What Causes global temperature – Quiz

  1. A global temperature has no meaning! Btw:
    For some repetition from another blog:
    man in a barrel says: 22 Mar 17 at 9:06 am

    (“So between say 1990 and 2005 global warming hysteria got embedded in the universities and was starting to get into the media and politics. Did it really only take 15 or so years for these institutions to lose their minds?”)

    Such nonsense seems to start in 1964 when Dr. Goody published his textbook on atmospheric physics. In that text he referenced the theory of Dr. Satyendra N. Bose. In 1924 Bose wrote a paper deriving Planck’s quantum radiation equation without any reference to classical physics by using a novel way of counting states with identical particles.creating the field of quantum statistics, now generally ignored. This paper completely ignored Maxwell’s famous equations for electromagnetic field theory; instead substituting his concept of ‘statistical photons’ as the method of radiant heat transfer! This in turn lead to the concept that a black-body must radiate according to a function its own temperature (t^4) independent of surround thermal electromagnetic opposing field strength, for a BB, also a proportional t^4. Such a conjecture is in direct conflict with Maxwell’s field theory, completely bogus, only true for a surround BB temperature of 0 Kelvin, and a violation of required mathematical precedence in evaluating Boltzmann;s (S-B) equation.
    Such is the history of what is still being fed to innocent university physics students. Only in some of the best EE curriculum do Maxwell’s equations, precede this utter BS. Without this nonsense no one could conceive of spontaneous thermal EMR flux being simultaneously generated in opposing directions. Such concept must be a violation of the second law of thermodynamics, An invention of a perpetuum mobile of the second kind, And the basis of all CAGW!! So no not 15 years, instead 53 years of the brainwashing of not so innocent children, many now college lecturers!
    These are the same lukewarmers that never even got a chance at learning the scientific method of “For every conjecture, a demonstration must be carefully designed that needs only the distinction between ‘maybe and FAIL’, claimed verification remains but maybe!” Rinse repeat until Failure or no more money! The skeptical folk need to concentrate on the repeating over and over the complete lack of any science at all in what has so far been presented.
    All the best! -will-

  2. Pingback: Initial Results of Survey | Scottish Sceptic

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>