A long time ago, I recognised that the climate signal was far too short a time period to be able to say anything at all about it – and so it was fraudulent to say much at all.
But academics don’t get grants for saying “we don’t know”.So a whole academic industry has been born to fabricate “understanding” about the climate where there is none.
And now it appears that much of what the public call “science” is very much the same: fraud!
-
Donations
-
I have removed Google ads due to Google's political bias on climate
-
Recent Posts
- Prediction: Strong La Nina
- Is human intelligence a parasitic life-form?
- The Physics of falling over
- TV maker Panasonic says it has developed the world’s best weather model
- Eco-vehicles fill air with deadly toxins
- Brexit: Please help!
- Dear Thomas
- EUampires: Did the Nazi’s really win the war?
- Parking global warming
- More evidence we sceptics are winning
- “Triffid killer weeds about to invade farmland as a result of CO2″
- BBC &%$£!
- 570 year record shows no change? Not for a trougher!
- And Trump wins?
- UKIP David Coburn on Climate
- Old People in Scotland are so moany why?
- The truth about Big green
- Rising CO2 greening the planet (again)
- Green house gas modelling – some thoughts.
- Physics of a reduced global atmosphere
-
Recent Comments
- Richard on Who runs the US? NOAA versus science, democracy & the US congress
- Dodgy Geezer on Is human intelligence a parasitic life-form?
- A.D. Everard on Prediction: Strong La Nina
- Scottish Sceptic on Prediction: Strong La Nina
- Scottish Sceptic on Toward a new theory of ice-ages XIV (Putting it all together)
-
Archives
-
Categories

