Common sense resturning to the Judiciary

For years we’ve seen a number of quite outrageous anti-science statements from a variety of judges who clearly didn’t know much about science nor the strong evidence contradicting the supposed theory of catastrophic warming and the clear evidence of deception by those like NASA with their fake temperatures.

However, now a Washington state judge has outraged the eco-terrorists and their snowflake supporters by saying:

“I don’t know what everybody’s beliefs are on [Manmade global warming], but I know that there’s tremendous controversy over the fact whether it even exists. And even if people believe that it does or it doesn’t, the extent of what we’re doing to ourselves and our climate and our planet, there’s great controversy over that.”

This entry was posted in Climate. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Common sense resturning to the Judiciary

  1. Ron Clutz says:

    Readers need to appreciate that Judge Rickert’s statements from the bench are courageous in light that far-left jurisdiction, and that he serves as an elected official. For more background on this, see:

    https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2017/01/31/climate-case-judge-defends-rule-of-law/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>