The Truth about the Highland Clearances

Were the clearances or the improvements more significant in the creation of the deserted upland landscapes which exist all over Scotland? What are the most important benefits of the study of deserted settlements? By Mike Haseler as part of Glasgow University Archaeology course (Note this is long: on A4 it is 20 pages long)

Preamble

Fig 1: Cadet George Armstrong "Autie" Custer, c1859

Fig 1: Cadet George Armstrong “Autie” Custer, c1859

The Battle of Little Bighorn or Custer’s Last Stand is an iconic battle between the Europeans and native Americans. It was fought in June 1876 between the Sioux nation “Indians” or “native Americans” and the 7th Cavalry: a veteran organisation created after the American Civil war. General Custer was of immigrant German and English stock. (Wert 1996).

In 1887 Buffalo Bill took his wild west show to Great Britain in celebration of the Jubilee year of Queen Victoria. Performers re-enacted the riding of the Pony Express, Indian attacks on wagon trains, and stagecoach robberies. The show was said to end with a re-enactment of Custer’s Last Stand, in which Cody portrayed General Custer. 21 years later a group of boys went to a camp on Brownsea island under a famous veteran of the Boer War Named “Baden Powell”. He enhanced and honed his military scouting skills amidst the native Zulu in the early 1880s in the Natal province of South Africa. It was this native “Scouting” which so attracted the boys and the group became known as the “Boy Scouts” – a name earlier used in 1899 to describe Harry White, Buffalo Bill’s assistant. A couple of decades after BP led to the foundation in 1926 of the “Hitler Jugend Bund der deutschen Arbeiterjugend”, (Hitler Youth League of German Worker Youth), along similar lines to the Boy Scouts but viewed as providing a future “Aryan supermen” indoctrinated in racist anti-Semitism. As soon as Hitler took power in 1933, the persecution and exodus of Germany’s 525,000 Jews began followed by their mass murder.

In his paper “Agents of Dispossession and Acculturation. Edinburgh Accountants and the Highland Clearances”, Stephen Walker (2003) summed up the the clearances thus:

The mass clearance of people from the Highlands and Islands remains one of the most emotive episodes in the history of Scotland. The attempts by Highland landowners to forcibly evict whole rural communities and encourage their migration in order to make way for large sheep farms and deer forests “is one of the sorest, most painful, themes in modern Scottish history” (Richards, 2000, p. 3). In his comprehensive history of the region, Hunter asserts that the clearances were “the absolute nadir of the entire Highlands and Islands experience” (1999, pp. 13–14). The eviction of crofters and cottars from the late 18th to the late 19th century continues to fuel sentiments of anti-landlordism and revulsion against the principal perpetrators: they “rank with Glencoe and Culloden in the literature of condemnation. It is a subject which regularly raises the chant of ‘genocide’ ” (Richards, 2000, p. 4).

The genocide to which Richards & Walker referred, was persecution and mass murder of the Jews by the Nazis; a genocide without equal, but one that was preceded by many others before and after Custer. Following the defeat of the Nazis there were massive changes. Israel was formed, the old colonial empires were dismantled. Forced “westernisation” of indigenous groups such as the Australian Aborigines ended, apartheid disappeared in S. Africa. Soon the “culture of apology” became widespread: in 2006 the UK issued “statement of regret” over slavery, likewise the US House of representatives in 2008. The UK & Australian governments apologised c2010 for the forced removal of aborigine children. So it is no surprise that almost as soon as the new Scottish parliament opened, it debated the following motion:

That the Parliament expresses its deepest regret for the occurrence of the Highland Clearances and extends its hand in friendship and welcome to the descendants of the cleared people who reside outwith our shores. ( S1M-1004 Scottish Parliament 2000)

And those listening were left with little doubt that members saw the highland clearances as one of racist genocide:

there is no doubt that they happened and that they led to the destruction of the Highlands that Boswell and Johnson saw in their celebrated tour of the Hebrides. At the time of their visit to the north, that process was already in hand, but the clearances were responsible for its completion. … In other countries, the genocide and ethnic cleansing that has taken place, against the Indians in America and the Aborigines in Australia, was acknowledged long ago. Today, the time to acknowledge what happened to those who were cleared from the Highlands has come. (Fergus Ewing (SNP))

2 Evidence

2.1 The narrative evidence

The highland clearances are a series of events in the 18th and early 19th century. For much of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Scottish historiography portrayed Culloden (1745) as a watershed that marked the onset of the Clearances (MacKillop 2003). A typical account is a narrative starting with Culloden, highlighting particular events such as the year of the sheep (1792), illustrating the horror of the events with accounts such as the Sutherland clearance (1811-1820) :

Patrick Sellar did, upon the 13th day of June, 1814, … violently turn out … Donald M’Kay, a feeble old man of the age of four-score years .. who, … not being able to travel to the nearest inhabited place, lay for several days and nights thereafter in the woods … also, Barbara M’Kay, … who was at the time pregnant, and …confined to her bed in consequence of being severely hurt and bruised by a fall; … saying, That you would have the house pulled about her ears; and [so she was carried] nearly a mile across the country to the imminent danger of her life: [also did] turn out, of his bed and dwelling, … Donald Munro, a young lad, who lay sick in bed at the time. And …wickedly and maliciously set on fire, burn, pull down, and demolish, … the house and barn … [of] Barbara M’Kay, an infirm old widow, nearly fourscore years of age, and who was obliged to sell three of her five cattle at an under value, in order to support herself, her crop being destroyed from the want of her barn: … And [did] kill Donald M‟Beath, father to Hugh M‟Beath, … by unroofing and pulling down, … the whole house … where the said Donald M‟Beath was then lying on his sick bed, saving only a small space of roof, …whereby the said Donald M‟Beath was exposed, …[and] in consequence … died about eight days thereafter … [and did] wickedly and maliciously set on fire, burn, and demolish, … the dwelling-house, …[of] Margaret M’Kay, a very old woman of the age of 90 years, … who had been bed-ridden for years, [knowing she] was at that time within … you were told that the said old woman could not be removed without imminent danger to her life; and the flames having approached the bed … she shrieked aloud in Gaelic, “O‟n teine,” that is to say, “O the fire,” …[and] carried out …and placed in a small bothy, and the blanket in which she was wrapped was burnt in several places, and … [she] never spoke a word thereafter, but remained insensible from that hour, and died in about five days thereafter. (Indictment of Patrick Seller)

There is no question that many of the deserted homesteads are a direct consequence of these clearances as the Rev. Donald Macleod, speaking of the minister of Morven said:

His later years were spent in pathetic loneliness. He had seen his parish almost emptied of its people. Glen after glen had been turned into sheep-walks, and the cottages in which generations of gallant Highlanders had lived and died were unroofed, their torn walls and gables left standing like mourners beside the grave, and the little plots of garden or of cultivated enclosure allowed to merge into the moorland pasture. He had seen every property in the parish change hands, and though, on the whole, kindly and pleasant proprietors came in place of the old families, yet they were strangers to the people, neither understanding their language nor their ways. …At one stroke of the pen,‟ he said to me, … “two hundred of the people were ordered off. …The sense of change was intensely saddened as he went through his parish and passed ruined houses here, there, and everywhere.” (MacKenzie 1883)

2.2 The statistical evidence

In 1755 Alexander Webster completed a census of Scotland and calculated the population of highland areas as being 266,085 between 1790-98 John Sinclair completed another and it had fallen by … well no! At 303,612, the fact is that in 42 years in the middle of the clearances as Meyer (1987) puts it, it has risen by “only 14%”. Even taking account of the 7% error estimated by Anderson (2011) in Webster’s figures, there is no way this can be construed as a population decline.

Fig 2: Change in Highland population 1755 to 1790s (Meyer 1987 p.49) Note Anderson (2011) suggests a 6.5% error in Webster's figures.

Fig 2: Change in Highland population 1755 to 1790s (Meyer 1987 p.49)
Note Anderson (2011) suggests a 6.5% error in Webster’s figures.

Perhaps there is a point that in contrast to the rise from 1,265380 to 1,526,492 of 21% for the rest of Scotland, the 14% rise in the highlands population was low, but Devine (1983 p.138), using a different definition for “Highlands” finds a higher rise of 20% between 1755 and 1795. Rising population is hardly evidence of systematic clearance let alone genocide. If we look at the data from MacKenzie, (fig 3 & 4) we see that total population (top line) in both Inverness and Caithness continues to rise after 1830 peaking in 1851 in Inverness and 1851-81 in Caithness. Far from supporting a narrative of systematic oppression in the 18th century, the population statistics tells a totally different story: a growing population if not a booming prosperous area, particularly in the large towns of Inverness (bottom area of Fig 3 ) and Wick (bottom area of fig 4)

Fig 3: Inverness Population 1831-1911

Fig 3: Inverness Population 1831-1911

Fig 4: Caithness Population 1831-1911

Fig 4: Caithness Population 1831-1911

Table 1: Graphs of population. Figures are stacked with largest parish lowest so that the top represents the total population for the shire.

Looking at Sutherland (fig 5) which is the quintessential clearance area, we also see a growing total (top line) population throughout the time of the Sutherland clearances (1811-20). Again peaking around 1830-50, only entering a decline after the period of the clearances.

Fig 5: Sutherland population. Figures are stacked with largest parish lowest so that the top represents the total population for the shire.

Fig 5: Sutherland population. Figures are stacked with largest parish lowest so that the top represents the total population for the shire.

In other words, there is not the slightest evidence that during the time of the clearances either Inverness, Caithness of Sutherland experienced any net decline in population; the decline started well after the time of the clearances.

Fig 6: Long-term population trends in Lochaber (1801-1961) by parishes (Turnock 1967)

Fig 6: Long-term population trends in Lochaber (1801-1961) by parishes (Turnock 1967)

2.3 Local changes

Looking at the paper from Turnock (1967) examining the detailed changes in the Lochaber area, we find that every area shows a rise in population from 1800 – 1830 except Glenelg and Morvern which show a small drop before they rise to the peak of 1830. After 1830, areas like Movern, Ardgour and Ardnamurchan & Sunart do show a precipitous decline as high as 75%, but this is part of a general trend that extends up to the 1950s. There is no evidence for the mass clearances of the highlands which most accounts describe before 1830.

Fig 7: The distribution of population in the Glen Roy/Glen Spean area (Kilmonivaig parish) in 1851, 1891and 1966. (Turnock 1967)

Fig 7: The distribution of population in the Glen Roy/Glen Spean area (Kilmonivaig parish) in 1851, 1891and 1966. (Turnock 1967)

However, if we look more closely at the figure 7 showing in detail the area of Glen Roy and Glen Spean to the north-east of Fort William, we see a general pattern of change. The 1851 distribution shows very dense settlement spread uniformly along the lower reaches of the Spean and Glen Roy, thinning out in the upper parts of the glens where possibilities for agriculture were very limited. By 1891, these smaller sites have shrunk many disappearing entirely by 1966. In contrast, the larger sites of 1851 have split dramatically into two groups: a few large population centres like Spean & Roy Bridge growing massively, with the bulk of sites decreasing in size.

fig_8

Looking at figure 8 we see the pattern is repeated in Knoydart. Of the 15 large population centres in 1841 only 4 are still sizeable in 1891 and by 1966 only Inverie remains. This seems to reinforce the data showing a few large towns like Inverness and Wick growing at a time of general population decline. It seems that the main change during the latter 19th century was a shift from small to large, from smaller settlement to larger county towns, and from smaller to growing centres in the lowlands. Is this what the writers are referring to? Is this the “smoking gun” evidence of the clearances?

2.4Regional change

During the time of the “clearances” of the 18th and early 19th century it is hard to use any other description about the highlands in general, other than it was booming: population growth was not only enough to fuel local growth, but enough to supply other areas as well such as the central/lowland zone. Not until 1831 did the population exodus from Argyllshire lead to a decline, not until 1841 in Sutherland and not till1851 in Inverness, and Ross and Cromarty. However there was a sharp divide in the experience of the NW mainland and Hebrides regions furthest from the lowlands and those areas closer: the southern, central and eastern highlands. All areas of the highlands experienced net emigration, but the pull of the lowlands was greater in the areas that were closest.

Fig 9: Perthshire Population 1831-1911

Fig 9: Perthshire Population 1831-1911

Fig 10: Argyll Population 1831-1911

Fig 10: Argyll Population 1831-1911

As figures 9 & 10 show, the decline in population in areas like Perthshire and Argyll began as early as 1830. Although after the major clearance events, it is significantly earlier than highland regions. Devine (1983) , notes that the southern and eastern parishes grew least at around 12 to 14 percent, whilst the growth in the north west …

was of the order of 34 per cent. Moreover, between 1801 and 1841 44 per cent of parishes in the south and east grew by less than 10 per cent while in the north west only 5 per cent did so. In the same period, population rose by 53per cent in the north west but by only 7 per cent in the sourthern zone [Gray 1957 p.59-60]

Devine backs this up by showing the source of migrants in lowland towns. Of the 112 highland women marrying in Greenock between 1761 and 1775, 109 were born in Argyllshire, two in Inverness-shire and one in Ross-shire. In 1851 1 in 26 of the highland born population of Greenock was born in Argyllshire compared to one in 235 born in Inverness-shire and one in 3,224 born in Sutherland. The 1821 Paisley census was the first to list birth place of the population. It shows 7% of the population were from the highlands with most from Argyllshire and eastern Inverness-shire. The traditional view of the highland “clearances” as a being something forced on the populace is impossible to square with this pattern of emigration. If emigration were linked to rising population, limited food and employment as many suggest (Gaskell 1996), then the areas most likely to suffer would be those further from the lowland areas of employment and food production. In contrast, it is those area closest to the employment opportunities in the growingly industrialised lowlands which experience migration strongest.

2.5 Historical changes

The highlands were unique because the feudalistic or perhaps more accurately Mafiosa clan system which put the clan at the centre of the highland economy was effectively abolished by the Tenures Abolition Act 1660 & Heritable Jurisdictions Act of 1746. The Tenures Abolition Act ended the feudal bond of military service; the Heritable Jurisdictions Act (passed after the Jacobite rebellion) removed the virtually sovereign power the chiefs held over their clan. The result was to break the old bond of loyalty between clansman and chief which not only created an obligation for the clansman to the chief but the chief to the clansman.

In order to break the force of clanship, administration has always practised the political maxim, Divide et impera. The legislature hath not only disarmed these mountaineers, but also deprived them of their antient garb, which contributed in a great measure to keep up their military spirit; and their slavish tenures are all dissolved by act of parliament; so that they are at present as free and independent of their chiefs, as the law can make them:(Smolledtt 1824)

In its place came a common law applied by civil jurisdiction rather than clan chiefs. The result was to take the centre of economic life away from the clan. It freed up trade allowing the development of urban centres reliant on trade and tradable commodities such as the wool & cattle needed during the Napoleonic wars. Indeed, the whole economy of the highlands changes from one of barter to one of accountants as walker (2003) shows by the active involvement of Edinburgh accountants in the highlands. However all areas were affected by a series of enclosure acts of 1661, 1685 & 1695 and division of Commodities Act of 1695 passed by the Scottish parliament. These allowed many landlord/laird to enclose their land without the agreement of their tenants. According to Caird (1964 p.73):

these acts were basic to the speed of transformation of the individual estates, as was the fact that at the time there were fewer than 8000 considerable proprietors in Scotland. … Investigations at Lix in Highland Perthshire have revealed a case of partial enclosure by rearrangments of the ferm-toun with “the individual farmers dispersed in two’s and three’s over the arable land” in about 1780 and cottages still being added until 1823. But in 1850, the clusters of joint-tenants at Easter Lix had disappeared and the lands were absorbed in an adjoining sheep farm. Great displacement of population undoubtedly took place, but the term ‘clearance’ is rarely used, for the displaced persons found employment and houses in the new villages in the neighbouring lowlands.

There was also an increased dependence on temporary migration. Seasonal migration by young adults at the bottom of the social ladder had been common in the 18th and early 19th century, but by the 1850s in became equally common among crofting and rent-paying families. (Devine 1979).

2.6 The Lowlands

When discussing the “highland” clearances it is easy to forget that similar changes were occurring all over Scotland. Whilst the pattern of population had changed in the highlands, a similar change had also been going on in the lowlands. The land was divided into medium and large sized estates and then carved up into individual farms. Just as the highlands had seen a move away from small to large holdings, so by 1830 sub-tenants had all but disappeared in the lowlands and the typical holding was 200 acres for large farms employing six men. Together with improved machinery, cropping and farm practices such as specialisation there was less need for permanent labour in the rural Lowlands. Whether cause or effect of the changes, farm labourers headed for the nearest town in search of work and accommodation. By 1851 15% of the population of Peebles-shire had made its way to Edinburgh. (Knox) Looking at Parry (2008) we see a similar pattern of settlement abandonment on the Lammermuir with increasing numbers after 1800 (however see section 2.8)

Date Settlements Abandoned Rate per century
1600 - 1750 48 32
1750 - 1800 21 42
1800 - 1825 54 216
1825 - 1860 70 200

Table 2: settlement abandonment on Lammermuir Hills based on figures from Parry (2008)

Like the highlands, the rate of lowland rural depopulation increased after 1840 due to the introduction of labour-saving technology, such as the self-binding reaper, the potato digger. The output per man increased dramatically: in 1840 it took 22 man days to tend an acre of barley; by 1914 it was down to 12 and by 1951 it had dropped to three. Not only was there less need for manpower, but former agricultural labourers might earn 50% more for industrial work. And town life was better or as a ploughman from Dumfries put it to the Royal Commission on Labour (1893-4) put it:

“the life of an agricultural labourer is altogether colourless … his life throughout is sleep, eat and work; no time for enjoyment as other labourers have; no half-holiday on Saturday … no holiday as a right, only as a favour; we get from three to four a year.”

2.7 Sheep

The introduction of sheep was synonymous with the “improvements”. According to Ryder (1968 p.155), the first stage in these improvement of the highlands was to abolish the runrig agriculture – made much simpler by the Scottish parliament’s acts. The rising population in the 18th century and the lack of capital after the failed Darien scheme meant many lairds lacked capital for other improvement and so converted their estates into sheep-walks. Sheep farmers from the south were offering high rents and so some of the first people to be forced from the land were the tacksmen. These had formerly been the chiefs’ agents, and could not afford the increased rents. The conflict of the tenants’ and landlords’ interests came to a head on the issue of sheep about 1780. Sheep farms were more economically viable and so were favoured not only by landlords, but even by tenants as they permitted higher secure rents, but the large sheep farm involved new men from the south because, as Ryder says:

the highlander disliked the lonely life of the shepherd. Also, the expense of the change meant that the landlord could not wait for the 2,000 sheep, regarded as being an economic flock, to build up, or for the local men to gain experience as shepherds (Ryder 1968)

However, the process of clearances were not necessarily the cause of regional depopulation. The sheep farms that replaced tenants also created economic opportunity in areas such as fishing and textile processing (Gray 1957) and there was a marked increase in the population of a few small towns. In the NW Tain (Ross-shire) rose 14% and Stornoway rose 30% between 1841 & 1851. And the evidence does confirm that the introduction of sheep helped stem the tide of emigration from the highlands as there is a lack of correlation between the spread of sheep farming and population as shown by detailed local studies. For example of Gray shows that of 14 parishes which in the 1790s had a ratio of sheep to population above the average in Argyllshire, 7 bucked the general decline and had an increase in population between 1755 and the 1790s. But of the 12 parishes with less than the average number of sheep relative to population, only 4 experienced a rise in population. It is therefore clear that sheep (I.e. improvements) were not a cause of population decline indeed introducing sheep seemed to cause population to increase.

2.8 Problems with preservation

According to Dixon, the single biggest problem in understanding deserted settlements is the lack of excavations. Parry (2008) highlighted the lack of excavation of deserted settlements when he examined the abandonment of upland sites in Southern Scotland. Although he found a very similar pattern to that seen in the highlands with massive increase in abandonment in the 19th century, he was unable to be sure of these figures, particularly the earlier one. As the scenes of Calligarry shows, between 1931 when figure 11 was taken and 2006 when figure 12 was taken, there has been a virtually wiping away of the settlement.

Fig 11: 21 September 1931

Fig 11: 21 September 1931

Fig 12: 29 August 2006

Fig 12: 29 August 2006

Table 3: Changes to Calligarry Township (Webb et al 2010)

The situation was far worse for many lowland sites because the buildings were made of clay and turf and occupiers were in the habit of simply abandoning one house and building another when it needed replacement. Dixon (2003 P. 57) also highlights the perishable nature of building material used in medieval buildings in Scotland and highlights the difficulty of dating earthworks even when datable pottery exists. In many cases the only certain evidence for settlements are those where broad rig cultivation can be identified. It is therefore unlikely that evidence of previous settlement would remain in areas of intensive ploughing whereas in areas of pasturage of cattle and sheep and upland areas where stone for building was freely available, the evidence of settlement would not only be more durable than turf and clay, but less prone to damage by ploughing. However, in those areas where farming was restricted by royal forests such as Liddesdale and Jedburgh there are upstanding remains of rural settlements that are potentially medieval. However even given the problem with archaeological evidence of desertion, Dixon is able to conclude that the medieval pattern of lowland Scotland was a mixture of large and small row villages, manors and granges, but in the upland areas there are farmsteads and shielings. In particular he finds that:

the relatively low-lying part of Scotland is recognisable as champion country by the 13th century … in contrast to this are the uplands, including the hinterland of Galloway, where a more dispersed pattern of settlement and shielings prevail.

To date, excavations of village sites indicate that they were newly planned settlements of the 12th century that underwent episodes of replanning, rebuilding, and late medieval desertion.

2.9 Climate

Deserted upland landscapes are nothing new. Anderson et al (1997) show that there was an abrupt change in climate to wetter conditions between 3500 to 3900 BP. Tipping et al (2007) record a significant shift to wetter mire surfaces by Loch Farlary c2900BP coinciding with a a change in land use with more population at lower levels which “may have been driven by an influx of people from other, less sheltered, upland areas. However Tipping did not find evidence the uplands were abandoned but instead inferred a change from subsistence farming to pastoral. However climate change was not all bad. Bonsall et al (2002) show a link between warming of the climate by around 1C and a move to drier conditions with the introduction of cereal to Scotland around 4100BC. Amesbury et al (2008) find a similar effect occurring in SW England around 1395 to 1155BC and concludes that “a marked climatic deterioration occurred in the late Bronze Age which can be linked to the abandonment of reave systems.” O’Sulliven (1976) identifies a similar period around Loch Pityoulish where there was a period of forest regeneration around 1650BP followed by the establishment of the medieval pattern of land use around 1000BP. Lamb in his wide ranging resume of the British Climate (1967 p.463) highlights the little ice age (a cold period between 1550 AD and 1850 AD) and quotes John Sinclair thus:

In his summary of the great Statistical Account of Scotland, Sir John Sinclair wrote, in 1825: There are grounds for contending that the climate of Scotland . . . was formerly superior to what it is at present. The hills were more covered with wood which skirted the arable ground [and] gave shelter to the crops . . . [There are] marks of cultivation . . . where nobody would now attempt to raise grain . . .’. It was to the eleventh to thirteenth centuries that later writers looked back as the golden age in Scottish history; and, as in England, it turns out that the most catastrophic events in the later chapters of Scottish history (Lamb, 1964 and 1965) fell close to the times of the worst climatie shocks reported elsewhere in Europe?in the fourteenth century and especially in the 1430’s and 1560’s.

Walton (1952) when examining the relationship between climate and the famines in NE Scotland again highlights the 1690s quoting Alexander 1877:

The ” Seven Ill Years ” or, as they were called by ardent Jacobites, ” King William’s Dear Years ” were years of dearth over the greater part of Scotland, though they were felt more severely in the north. According to the graphic description of one reporter in the South West of Scotland, ” these manifold unheard-of judgements continued seven years, not always alike, but the seasons, summer and winter (were) so cold and barren, and the wonted heat of the sun so much withholden that it was discernible upon the cattle, flying fowl and insects decaying, seldom a fly or a cleg was to be seen ; our harvests (were) not in the ordinary months ; many were shearing in November and December, some in January and February ; many contracted their deaths and lost the use of feet and hands working in frost and snow ; and after all, some of it was still standing and rotting upon the ground ; much of it was of little use to man or beast and it had no taste or colour of meal.” [Alexander 1877]

Grain had to be imported (although prohibited by an Act of 1672) and export was prohibited, but still there were wholesale deaths and depopulation. Walton states the effects were harshest in the interior whereas Moray and Buchan had less intense frosts and suffered less and there was a high mortality rate. He goes on to say:

Of sixteen families that resided on the farm of Littertie, thirteen were extinguished. On the estate of Greens which (in 1793) accommodates 169 individuals, three families, the proprietor’s included, only survived. The extensive farms of Touchar, Greeness, Overhill and Burnside of Idoch, being entirely desolated, were converted into a sheep-walk by the Errol family to whom they then belonged. The inhabitants of the parish in general were diminished by death to one half, or as some affirm, to one fourth of the preceding number.” (Walton quoting the Old Statistical Account Monquhitter. 6 (18):132)

Until the year 1709 many farms in the Monquhitter district lay waste and even at that time the landlord found great difficulty in getting tenants. It was also said by some eighteenth century writers that the Seven Ill Years led to wholesale depopulation of many other interfluvial tracts of the low Buchan plateau. At that time most of this land was still moss and moor, but it retained in places the marks of the plough. (Walton 1952 p.15)

The famines of the 1690s were widespread and Lamb (p.460) tells us that the the settlement of Daintoun (Davington), 9 miles east of Moffat and 260m above sea level was abandoned between 1690 and 1710. This was the worst period of what some call “the little ice-age age”. According to Lamb:

it has been estimated that all over the uplands of Scotland one third to a half of the population died; large areas which had been farmed until then were abandoned and covered by the heather.

As figure 13 shows, England in the 1690s experienced the worst cold period in its recorded history.

These observations suggest temperatures 1.5-2.0 ‘C below twentieth century values averaged over the year, a lowering twice to three times as great as that which has been substantiated in central England from actual thermometer readings (Pfister 1994 referring to LAMB,1982).

Fig 13: Central England Temperature (F) since 1680 with 1690 highlighted in blue.From lamb Fig 1. p. 446

Fig 13: Central England Temperature (F) since 1680 with 1690 highlighted in blue.From lamb Fig 1. p. 446

The ill years occurred in the middle of a period of low sun activity which some (Svensmark) attribute to to a period of low solar activity that occurred between 1645 to 1715 known as the Maunder Minimum. A similar period occurred from 1790 to 1830 (Known as the Dalton Minimum) and yet again we see a dip in the temperature (albeit shallower) and find authors like Woods (1985) referring to the climate in his paper: “the complicity of the climate in the 1816 depression of Dumfriesshire” in which he concludes:

The lesson of the year 1816 is a simple and fundamental one. Major economic modifications were inevitable in Britain following the Napoleonic Wars. Through the working of numerous factors, living became more and more difficult in 1815-1816, especially for the relatively new masses in the industrial centres; yet the agricultural community could stand somewhat aloof from these difficulties because its produce was always needed. In 1816, however, the addition of an extraordinary phenomenon—the severe inclemency of the weather in all seasons—precipitated the agricultural community into its own depression; an almost totally ruined harvest was the dénouement of a year in which customers had not been able to pay prices in any way compatible with the high rents of agricultural land. As a result farmers went bankrupt and labourers in large numbers were deprived of work.

In work by Carter et al (1997) we see in the pollen analysis a clear transition occurring around 1700 corresponding with the ill years and the cessation of ploughing has a terminus ante quem of 1725 given by the date at which Lour Park was created. Whilst less clear we may also have evidence for another change at the end of the Dalton minima in 1825/50 when pollen analysis shows rough grazing & pastures ends in the area.

Fig 14: Chronological synthesis of the documentary, archaeological and palynological interpretation for Lour (Carter et al 1997)

Fig 14: Chronological synthesis of the documentary, archaeological and palynological interpretation for Lour (Carter et al 1997)

The evidence of famine and death in the 1690s is impossible to deny, but it is not (yet) supported by the archaeological evidence from those such as Parry (table 2) which although Parry states it is difficult to date early sites and that many 17th century ones have been missed, there is apparently no massive abandonment around 1700.

3 Discussion

Far from illuminating events, the focus on clearances seems to to have created a false narrative which is completely at odds with the evidence. Whilst some events can be portrayed as landlord oppression of their tenants, these are not unique to the highlands or to Scotland. If anything the highlands are more resilient with changes happening later and active support from landlords for tenants. In the mid 19th century many landlords actively helped emigration from the NW region of Scotland. Devine tells us that during the 1840s and 1850s we see a series of clearance schemes with assisted emigration to Canada and Australia. The tea magnate James Matheson who owned Lewis helped 1,777 people to emigrate between 1851 and 1855. Gordon of Cluny who owned most of Barra, South Uist and Benbecula took no fewer than 2,715 of his tenants to Canada between 1848 and 1851, but only after a series of brutal evictions. On Skye and North Uist 2,500 of Lord McDonald’s tenants were helped to Canada and Australia between 1849 and 1856. Between 1840 and 1843 about 40% of emigrants from Scotland were from the Western highlands and the majority of these from the NW and Hebrides. But we must not forget that whilst the impact on the population was benign if not beneficial, there was a huge impact on the highland culture, a culture than many highlanders sought to protect:

The highland emigrants of this period apparently sought to perpetuate a familiar style of life in better surroundings. Despite the distances involved in emigration, the world of the small farmer and fisherman on the Canadian islands was closer to that of the Hebridean crofter than a new life in the lowland towns. Highland emigrants from the north west were transplanting an entire society, an option not available to those who moved to the south. Above all, they were intent on obtaining land and re-establishing themselves in the status they had lost in the highlands. (Devine)

Given that in the 1690s there was mass starvation, by the standards of the time, the picture this portrays is of a highland way of life which is not only relatively prosperous & healthy as shown by the increasing population, but one which the participants wished to maintain. Moreover, even when the economic opportunity for improvement via emigration presented itself, the populace often preferred to remain. The strong social and cultural bonds remained despite the economic advantages presented by emigration.

In essence, therefore, the north-west highlands and islands was still a peasant society and the inhabitants had the tenacious attachment to land characteristic of all such societies. It was this which caused them to emigrate across the world to seek a reinstatement upon land and to cling to minute crofts rather than move in large numbers to an alien life in the towns of the south.(Devine)

What was it that created such a relatively prosperous area of the NW highlands. Before 1815 there was an expansion of the Herring fishery, kelp manufacturing and cattle prices rose steadily during the Napoleonic wars and military service was available for the young men. New crops, particularly potatoes and new breeds such as black faced sheep suitable for mountainous country increased agricultural output. Even after 1815, when military employment ceased, when cattle prices slumped, when there were rent arrears, evictions and landlord bankruptcies,the fact was that the population continued increasing thus showing that highland farming was prosperous Whilst there were some bad landlords, it is difficult to believe that the aim of evictions was the politically portrayed expulsion of population which modern narratives attempt to force onto the events. Instead the evidence supports the view of a resettlement of population to provide a specialism of labour creating a more economically beneficial system for the benefit of both landlord and tenant. E.g. the mass expulsions of the Sutherland estates resulted in a redistribution rather than an exodus. In 1819 according to Devine 3,331 individuals were removed of which 2,304 were resettled on the estate, 223 moved to adjoining properties; 661 migrated to neighbouring counties; 83 emigrated and the estate administration was unable to trace 57 (Richards 1973 p.208) However it is equally clear that famine and starvation did have a demographic effect. According to Flinn, the potato famine of the 1840s provided an incentives for landlords in the western isles and NW mainland to rid their estates of what they increasingly saw as a redundant population. Flinn (1977 p.57) estimates the consequence loss of population in the western isles as a quarter to a third of the resident population. Cameron indicates that between 1852 and 1857 about 16,000 persons were assisted to cross the Atlantic from the north-west highlands.(Cameron 1970 p.317-18)(Cameron 1972) But note the word is “assisted”, not compelled. These are not the acts of heartless landlords. More importantly we should question the motives of some commentators who liken the clearances to genocide and contrast the assisted emigration schemes which began around the 1830s and which commentators assert continued on a “massive scale synchronised with widespread eviction of peasants” (Hunter 1997 p.73-88)(Richards 2002 p.363-471) with the reported genocide of the indigenous groups in Australia and America which these highlanders were replacing. Emigration did occur, but the evidence in Sutherland with only 2.5% of those being evicted leaving the area (not even Scotland) with 69% staying on the same estate doesn’t support the narrative of forced emigration by clearance particularly when brutal evictions were common throughout England and Scotland at the time. But a stronger reason to suspect the popular accounts such as the year of the sheep in 1792 is that there is a lack of correlation between the spread of sheep farming and population as shown by Gray who if anything shows that the introduction of sheep was reducing the rate of population decline. In other words the improvements in the agriculture in this area was having net beneficial effects and preventing population decrease.

3.1 Rewriting history

Whilst the Sutherland clearances were clearly brutal, the real question we must ask is whether they were unusual for the time? As late as 1902 George Sims was writing of very similar scenes clearing London slums:

After notice had been served upon them some began at once to look about for other accommodation. But the larger number, because it is the nature of the slum dwellers to live only for to-day and to trust to luck for to-morrow, did nothing. At last came the pinch. The authorities served the last notice, “Get out, or your walls will crumble about you.” The tenant who after that still remained obstinate soon realised that the end had come. The roof, the doors, and the windows were removed while she (it is generally a woman) still remained crouching in a corner of the miserable room which contained the chair, the table, the bed, the frying pan, and the tub that were her furniture.

Eventually the position became dangerous. When bricks and plaster began to fall in showers about her, and the point of the pickaxe came through the wall against which she was leaning, then at last she scrambled for her belongings and went out unto the street, where a little crowd of onlookers and fellow sufferers welcomed her sympathetically. … Sometimes a whole family, the head having failed or neglected during the period of grace to find accommodation elsewhere, is turned into the street. I have seen families sitting homeless on their goods, which were piled on the streets.

If Sutherland is evidence of mass genocide in the highlands is such an account as that above evidence of genocide in London? Could an account of families having their houses torn down around them and being turfed out onto the street explain the massive clearance of London? Of course not! London grew before, during and after the slum clearances, so why are accounts in Sutherland that differ little from other contemporary texts taken as evidence of genocide? How can those who so readily highlight the evictions on the Sutherland estate fail to compare this to similar clearances in the 18th century like the London slums. Particularly when as stated, of the 3,331 individuals removed in 1819, 2,304 were resettled on the estate and only 83 emigrated. The idea that landlords systematically forced people into emigration is hard to square with e.g. The introduction of the Passenger Act in 1803 passed according to Brown “to stuanch the ‘people’s clearance’ … [by] rendering the costs of emigration prohibitively expensive”. Even on St Kilda we find that the landlords are hardly enthusiastic to see their tenants leave:

In 1853 one-third of the population of St Kilda snapped up the opportunity to emigrate to Port Phillip (Melbourne); they were accompanied as far as the Broomielaw in Glasgow by their distraught landlord who pleaded with them to stay, and wept tears on their departure.(Richards 2002 p.5)

Much of the “highland clearances” is the inference drawn from an almost blatant misinterpretation of a number of high profile events such as those in Strathnaver in 1814, Glengarry (1785-1802) (McLean 1991), Gruids (1821), Skye (1853), Knoydart and Greenyards (1855). Whilst these events were undoubted displays of landlord power pitted against the wishes of those removed, we should perhaps draw parallels to modern events such as the closure of Scottish Iron, Coal and other industries and those bitter struggles. Strife in itself is not the same as “oppression”. All change is to some extent opposed by at least some of those involved, and if we focus on the high profile instances of strife without trying to see the bigger picture we may be forgiven if e.g. we were to read from the economic strife of the miner’s strikes on 1984/5 as a massive decline in the general prosperity of Scotland, whereas the facts of figure 15 show otherwise that the economy grew both before, during and after the “disaster” of the miner’s strike.

Fig 15: Scottish GDP 1979-2010 at basic prices (Scottish Government)

Fig 15: Scottish GDP 1979-2010 at basic prices (Scottish Government)

So, we must be able to justify rather than accept the common consensus as portrayed by Fergus Ewing MSP:

there is no doubt that they happened and that they led to the destruction of the Highlands that Boswell and Johnson saw in their celebrated tour of the Hebrides. At the time of their visit to the north, that process was already in hand, but the clearances were responsible for its completion. (Fergus Ewing (SNP))

There were certainly regional differences, but if anything the greatest discrepancy in growth was in the areas closest to the lowlands and not those typically related in the clearance narratives such as Skye and Knoydart. This certainly is not the holocaust of popular portrayal. So, how does this compare with “the genocide and ethnic cleansing” spoken of by Fergus Ewing to the “Indians in America and the Aborigines in Australia”? Estimates put the number of Tasmanian aborigines before British colonisation in 1803 at 3,000–15,000, in 1833 due to disease and warfare there were approximately 200 remaining (Wikipedia). According to Wikipedia (Population history of indigenous peoples of the Americas):

Repeated outbreaks of European infectious diseases such as influenza, measles and smallpox (to which they had no natural immunity), combined with dispossession from European/Canadian settlements and repressive policies, resulted in a forty to eighty percent aboriginal population decrease post-contact.[Wilson, Donna M; Northcott, Herbert C (2008)] For example, during the late 1630s, smallpox killed over half of the Wyandot (Huron), who controlled most of the early North American fur trade in what became Canada. They were reduced to fewer than 10,000 people [Robertson, Ronald G (2001)].

And lest we forget, in 1933 it is estimated some 522,000 Jews lived in Germany. On the eve of WWII only 214,000 (41%) remained. In May 1943, Nazi German authorities reported that the Reich was “judenrein” (“free of Jews”). By this time, mass deportations had left fewer than 20,000 Jews in Germany.

3.2 The real highland clearances

The truth is that as a region, there were no highland clearances before the mid 19th century and that the evidence available suggests that the improvements actually stemmed emigration from the highlands rather than accelerated it. Whilst there is evidence that smaller settlements suffered more than larger ones, the strongest driver appears to be economic pull from the lowlands and foreign territories rather than clearance evictions or improvements. The evictions which occurred, whilst brutal by our standards, were not out of character with the time. Indeed, if anything the landlords showed incredible care for their tenants and concern for their welfare – if for no other reason than that their own economic prosperity relied on the abundant supply of labourers. For obvious reasons given the lack of any real evidence of a systematic “clearance” and the way these events have been falsely used to create a narrative of the “Fuadach nan Gàidheal” (expulsion of the Gael), few commentators put a date to the end of the highland clearances. Wikipedia lists events up until the actions of Elizabeth Leveson-Gower, Duchess of Sutherland, and her husband who conducted brutal clearances between 1811 and 1820. McNeil citing Prebble (1982) lists the last clearances as of Glenelg, Sollas in 1849 and South Uist and Barra in 1851. So we can safely say the following graph shows highland and island population after the clearances showing a dramatic decline from the 1850s until the 1970s of 22%.

Fig 16: Population Change, Highlands and Islands 1851-2001 (Scot Exec 2005 Chart 4.3)

Fig 16: Population Change, Highlands and Islands 1851-2001 (Scot Exec 2005 Chart 4.3)

According to some: “What the Clearances started, however, the First World War almost completed.” (Wikipedia Highland Clearances). The claim is that the 1921 census shows a “significant” decrease in Gaelic speakers because Scotland lost over 147,000 men in WWI amounting to 20% of Britain’s losses whilst Scotland only has 10% of the total British population). However this claim that WWI “completed” the highland clearances is hard to justify.

Fig 17: Gaelic Speaker 1755- 2001 (Table amended from MacAulay 1992)

Fig 17: Gaelic Speaker 1755- 2001 (Table amended from MacAulay 1992)

True the 1921 census shows a larger than usual decrease, but as the figures show the slightly higher decline in this period is part of a general post 1891 trend. Even if the 1755 figure of Walker can be taken as Monolingual speakers of Gaelic rather than bi-lingual as drawn below, the story seems to be more one of steady decline rather than precipitous fall. Above table (fig 19) shows numbers of Gaelic speakers taken from MacAulay (1992) and s plotted below (fig 20). MacAuley figures come from Sinclair, Websters and census data (Scottish Government 2011)

Fig 18: Scottish Gaelic Speakers 1755-2001

Fig 18: Scottish Gaelic Speakers 1755-2001

However, MacAudley makes some rash assumptions about the 1881 and 1755 figures as being monolingual, which do not make sense when it was plotted as there would be a sudden precipitous fall between 1881 and 1891 which is not explained. Looking deeper, the 1881 census question was whether they “Habitually spoke Gaelic”. This did not exclude speaking English. Similarly the 1755 result produced by Walker reflected those areas where Gaelic was “either preached or spoken by the natives”. John Sinclair recounting the area of Lochgoil-head and Kilmorich illustrates that many “Gaelic speakers” were bilingual:

The Gaelic language is most generally spoken in this district. The greater number of the people speak English, but not in general with so much ease and fluency as they speak Gaelic. Many of the old people understand no English. (John Sinclair)

When taken as “bilingual” the overall trend of the graph roughly follows the general population of the highlands (fig 16) with a steady drop and precipitous decline after 1910. However, it should not be forgotten that the 1881 figure included monolingual Gaelic speakers and excluded those who could speak Gaelic but did not do so habitually. But whether or not the 1755 result is taken as monolingual or bilingual, there was clearly a massive decline in Gaelic speaking in Scotland in the 20th century. Is this what really lies behind the claims of the “highland clearances”?

3.3 The clansman as noble savage

I started this essay referring to Custer and his portrayal in Buffalo Bill’s wild west show. Custer was not a Scot: we know this because US historians (with little history of their own) have an obsession with their European origins – second only to their obsession with the repression of evil British state that “forced” them into independence. Everyone with a Scots sounding name in the US seems to be descended from someone who was oppressed by the evil British. But what of the native Americans whose lands were stolen by the “poor” Scots forced out by the evil British empire? When Custer was still at school in 1853 Charles Dickens wrote his essay on “The Noble Savage”:

To come to the point at once, I beg to say that I have not the least belief in the Noble Savage. I consider him a prodigious nuisance, and an enormous superstition. His calling rum fire- water, and me a pale face, wholly fail to reconcile me to him. I don’t care what he calls me. I call him a savage, and I call a savage a something highly desirable to be civilised off the face of the earth. I think a mere gent (which I take to be the lowest form of civilisation) better than a howling, whistling, clucking, stamping, jumping, tearing savage. It is all one to me, whether he sticks a fish-bone through his visage, or bits of trees through the lobes of his ears, or bird’s feathers in his head; whether he flattens his hair between two boards, or spreads his nose over the breadth of his face, or drags his lower lip down by great weights, or blackens his teeth, or knocks them out, or paints one cheek red and the other blue, or tattoos himself, or oils himself, or rubs his body with fat, or crimps it with knives. Yielding to whichsoever of these agreeable eccentricities, he is a savage – cruel, false, thievish, murderous; addicted more or less to grease, entrails, and beastly customs; a wild animal with the questionable gift of boasting; a conceited, tiresome, bloodthirsty, monotonous humbug.

Yet it is extraordinary to observe how some people will talk about him, as they talk about the good old times; how they will regret his disappearance, … they will either be determined to believe, or will suffer themselves to be persuaded into believing, that he is something which their five senses tell them he is not. (Dickens)

Fig 19: Mel Gibson, Braveheart

Fig 19: Mel Gibson, Braveheart

Today, Dickens is primarily associated with the concept of “Dickensian London”, the place of Fagen, Oliver Twist, the workhouse and the slum. Why is his views on Victorian London so vividly remembered, but not his views on the noble savage? In no small part, his portrayal of the slums & grime of early industrial Britain have coloured our picture of the past so that most see the industrialisation of Britain and Scotland as an unwelcome intrusion into an idyllic “Braveheart” countryside inhabited by the noble savage Dickens so openly despised.

Fig 20: Scout Movement founder Robert Baden-Powell with Sioux Indian Chief Dr. Charles A. Eastman in Queens' College, Cambridge, UK, in 1928.This is part of a fabricated history. The fact is that people did not move to places like New Lanark (founded 1785) because of evil oppression by British, English, lowlanders, climate or even green tentacled aliens. They moved to the industrial cities by choice: better housing, better jobs, better pay. Shops did away with the “daily grind” of processing cereals and coal did away with back breaking job of peat cutting in the midges. They moved because working in a factory, however bad it may seem to us today, was far better than the upland countryside we townies now see as an idyllic retreat. The life in a factory was far better than the dirty grimy countryside from which these factory workers were desperate to escape. The factories gave them the opportunity to better themselves.

Why is it then, that so many people see this period in Scotland’s history through the tartan tinted spectacles of the clearances? The facts don’t back up this narrative of oppression, so why is this view so compulsive? For any who have been taught the history of Scouting, that countryside was the very birthplace of Scouting. This was not an isolated social phenomena.

Fig 20: Scout Movement founder Robert Baden-Powell with Sioux Indian Chief Dr. Charles A. Eastman in Queens' College, Cambridge, UK, in 1928.

Fig 20: Scout Movement founder Robert Baden-Powell with Sioux Indian Chief
Dr. Charles A. Eastman in Queens’ College, Cambridge, UK, in 1928.

Today few even connect “Scouts” with army offices, far less realise that this organisation was accompanied by many similar schemes: the Woodcraft Indians by Ernest Seton 1902, Boys Brigade (1884), the Boys’ Guide Brigade (1902) and the German “Wandervogel” (1901). In particular Seton wrote a manual which he sent to Baden Powell which clearly was inspirational: “The Birch Bark Roll of the Woodcraft Indians” (1906). This was a general movement:

the arts and crafts revival and the related enthusiasm for nature study and the woodcraft movement, all in some ways connected with tourism, emerged in the early decades of the twentiest century as an ambiguous antimodernist reponse to the increasing fragmentation and rationalisation of modern urban-industrial living. Just as Teddy Roosevelt advocated for rural living and the strenuous life, upper and middle-class Americans sought “authentic” experience, “real” life, and self fulfillment through handcraftmanship, romantic nature and the noble savage. (Rothman & Studies 2003)

In the same way Buffalo Bill’s portrayal of the attempted massacre of indigenous Americans at Custer’s last stand was a complete betrayal of the real history of that people, so many modern historians have rewritten the history of the Scottish uplands to fit a sanitised “arts and crafts” views of an idyllic countryside of “noble savages”. The countryside is good, the town is bad, the clansman is a noble savage, those improving the lot of the Scots through factories are bad … even oppressive. Scouting today is part of a culture that has so sanitised the “noble savage” that e.g. modern “Scouts” do not even realise Scouts were an elite military force – part of Custer’s last stand – part of the genocide of Native peoples worldwide. Likewise whilst the clansman of the 17th century was a military solider, but the clansman of the highland clearances is an idyllic “noble savage” in harmony with the countryside. The clansman didn’t change, only the tartan tinted glasses of the Scottish arts and crafts revival of the 20th century. Today the (American) tourist is treated to a compelling story of (English) oppression of noble clansmen (savages) and their crafts displays (backbreaking work) before being lead into the shop to buy their “highland clearance book” and Edinburgh woollen (mill) sweaters.

Fig 21: Buffalo Bill's Wild West Date 1890

Fig 21: Buffalo Bill’s Wild West Date 1890

This rewriting of history was there right at the time of the first accounts when the Reverend Donald refers to the highlanders as aborigine:

It was a very short time previous to my residence in Mr. MacKid’s family that the first “Sutherland Clearance” took place. This consisted in the ejection from their minutely-divided farms of several hundreds of the Sutherlandshire aborigines, who had from time immemorial been in possession of their mountain tenements. … the Sutherland Clearance of 1819 was not only the climax of their system of oppression for many years before, but the extinction of the last remnant of the ancient Highland peasantry in the north. (The Rev. Donald Sage on the Sutherland Clearances in MacKenzie 1883)

This is part of a long tradition starting with early portrayals of the Picts such as De Bry’s to portray the natives of Scotland in the form of the “noble savage”.

Fig 22: Hand-colored version of Theodor de Bry’s “The true picture of one Pict,” was originally published as an illustration in Thomas Hariot’s 1588 book “A Briefe and True Report of the New Found Land of Virginia.”

Fig 22: Hand-colored version of Theodor de Bry’s “The true picture of one Pict,” was originally published as an illustration in Thomas Hariot’s 1588 book “A Briefe and True Report of the New Found Land of Virginia.”

Fig 23: From Theodor de Bry's America 1590"A Werowan or great Lorde of Virginia" (detail) engraved by Theodor De Bry after a painting by John White.

Fig 23: From Theodor de Bry’s America 1590″A Werowan or great Lorde of Virginia” (detail) engraved by Theodor De Bry after a painting by John White.

Fig 24: Macquarrie Costumes of the Clans of Scotland. 1899. The Clans of the Scottish Highlands, (R. R. McIan 1845)

Fig 24: Macquarrie Costumes of the Clans of Scotland. 1899. The Clans of the Scottish Highlands, (R. R. McIan 1845)

It is therefore an obvious trap to believe that just as the indigenous people of Australia, the Americas, Africa, etc. were repressed, then so were the Highlanders by the English/Lowlander.

4 Conclusion

Much of the uplands of Scotland have always been a wilderness, however there have been periods when they have seen more people than now. The bronze age was such a period when a warmer climate allowed viable agriculture on the higher slopes and we see numerous examples of hut circles throughout Scotland. Climate clearly continued to influence the highlands as shown by the abandonment of Daintoun and evidence that around a quarter of the highland population died in the 1690s. Indeed, given the suggestion that the situation in Scotland was twice to threes times worst than England, and that England had the worst period of cold on record, it is hard to believe that there is so little evidence of abandoned villages at this time. Given the apparent lack of detailed work on abandoned settlements and the subsequent lack of chronology of abandonment, is it possible a substantial number identified as being abandoned during the “clearances” were abandoned after the 1690s famines? All we can say, is that further research is necessary to fully understand the role of climate at this time. What we can say with certainty, is that the popular story of the “highland clearances” as “genocide” is totally at odds with the evidence of a growing population and growing economic prosperity as new urban centres developed in the late 18th century. Whilst many evictions were brutal, in comparison to those in other areas like London, many Highland landlords appear to be almost the paradigm of virtue (for their time). Not only did they provide alternative accommodation on their estates, but in some cases they paid the families to emigrate (although perhaps out of self interest to secure labourers for their own expanding estates abroad). But we cannot underestimate the traditional clan bond that encouraged a more benign attitude to the tenants in Scotland than was found in similar slum clearances in London. A better understanding of the distribution and chronology of clearance can only be obtained through detailed and widespread excavation. The irony of the highland clearances is that many of the actions of the clan chiefs which should have been seen as beneficial caused their actions to be recorded and portrayed so badly. They helped establish schools, brought in ministers for the church, courts were established such as that which tried Patrick Sellar. There was a general opening up of the highlands to the view of the world outside so that the slum clearances in the highlands which were typical of the time were recorded not only by visiting outsiders but by those involved. They result is that we have a record of what appears to be typical behaviour of the period which now is used to condemn highland landlords.

In 1840 Donald MacLeod finally found a champion when the Edinburgh Weekly Chronicle published 21 of his letters, which helped to transform Lowland public opinion on the clearances. These letters were later published (in expanded form) as the “History of the Destitution of Sutherlandshire.”

At this point, the Sutherlands received some literary support from an unexpected quarter. Harriet Beecher Stowe, the author of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, visited Dunrobin in 1856, and shortly after published her “Sunny Memories”, stating, despite criticisms of the Clearances, that: “To my view it is an almost sublime instance of the benevolent employment of superior wealth and power in shortening the struggles of a civilisation and elevating in a few years a whole community to a point of education and material prosperity, which, unassisted they might never have obtained.” (BBC 2004) The truth of the upland clearances is that all areas of Britain experienced similar changes as farming changed from small tenancies dispersed in the landscape, to a smaller number of larger farms with many tenants finding better situations in the growing urban centres. In England and the lowlands this movement was marked by a change in distribution, in Scotland, because the urban centres naturally congregated in the valleys where transportation links and building land was best, this change in distribution is marked by a change from upland to lowland. But the evidence does not show a general decline in population until after 1830. Only then does the growing economic pull of the large cities like Glasgow and the growing economies of the British colonies attract the population due to higher wages. The new economy of the 18th century highlands was now inter-clan based. Local towns began springing up, goods and services were no longer at the beck and call of the clan leader, but could be secured by travelling to local centres of trade. The result was that the guild and market structures that had long existed in the lowlands sprung up in the highlands in towns creating a pull for workers to move out of the relatively economically disadvantaged valleys. Whilst the evidence shows that growing economic prosperity elsewhere pulled population away from the highlands and that neither the clearances nor the improvements were to blame for large scale depopulation of the area, they did have local effects: population migrated toward urban areas, large numbers of outsiders were brought in and there was a breakdown in the traditional “family” and meta-family economic unit of the clan. But the popular narrative of the clearances is false. Yet it is almost as if the facts do not matter when it comes to this history. Some wish to portray Scotland and particularly the Clansmen in the image of the noble savage: a repressed group whose virtue was that they were “closer to nature” or as Dickens puts it a: “ howling, whistling, clucking, stamping, jumping, tearing savage(s)”.

Fig 25: James Watt Cottage and Graffitied Steam Engine Cylinder (Canmore)

Fig 25: James Watt Cottage and Graffitied Steam Engine Cylinder (Canmore)

The real story of Scotland in this period is not that of the oppressed noble savage of the clearances but people like James Watt who invented the steam engine in 1775. But what is it that every museum and book of the period remembers? The oppressed noble savage! And where is that steam engine? It is dumped round the back of Kinneil House beside the roofless cottage where James watt lived covered in graffiti. It is as if Scotland does not want to admit that Scotsmen like James Watt led the world and it was they who were attracting the highlanders away from the uplands – not by whinging about oppression, but by creating a vibrant economy based on great thinkers like Hume and Smith and engineers like Watt. Yet where are we now? After decades of emigration, we are led by whinging politicians whose first act in power is to seek an apology for mythical genocide apparently seeking to blame the economic problems of modern Scotland on the clearances rather than their own inability to understand the ingredients that are necessary to create a vibrant economy utilising the engineering skills that once made Scotland great. Whether or not Scotland goes for independence, any government policy needs to be based on a real understanding of the ingredients that create success. From an archaeological viewpoint, deserted settlements are a time capsule from a period in history, a culture and a landscape for which few records exist. Our modern view of the highlanders comes to us through the distorted lens of Celticness, clans, tartans and most of all “highland oppression”. That lens paints a picture of a clansmen in the Noble savage tradition as a victim. In doing so, it portrays Scotland as an oppressed backward country: a huge Disneyland theme park for tourists to come a gawk as the quaint Scots in the Victoriana Kitch of Kilt, Sporran and whisky. The real truth is that many of the highlanders who emigrated were themselves responsible for oppression of indigenous peoples throughout the world. Is that the reason for this obsession with repression? Is it some kind of guilt complex by home-coming Scots trying to claim that they were the victims and not the indigenous peoples they forced of their own lands? The Battle of Little Bighorn or Custer’s Last Stand is an iconic battle between the Europeans and native Americans which was later re-enacted by Buffalo Bill portraying an entirely false image of the native American allowing further repression and racial stereotyping. The highland clearances is now an iconic battle between the oppressed Gaelic culture of the highlands and the lowland/English oppressors which is likewise falsely portrayed by those seeking to politically capitalise such as those fanning the sectarian divide of catholic highlander and protestant lowlander that continues to undermine modern society. Just as we should not deny the reality of genocides such as the Jews, indigenous Americans or Aborigines, it is equally wrong to portray events that were not genocide as such because such assertions only seek to question the authenticity of genuine oppression. The highland clearances were probably no more notable in their time than the clearances of the Gypsies of Dale farm. Such rent evictions were common; what was new was the wealth of commentators who felt they had a right to comment. This in itself marked a change in economics: a wealth that not only allowed individuals to travel for pleasure to the highlands, but one that allowed the printing of their work and enough people willing and able to pay to read their work. Those early tourists have now had their place taken by the home-coming Scots and it cannot be denied that a large chunk of Scotland’s economy now relies on this “tartan tat”. But by pandering to this myth we are hiding a far more important reality: intellectually and economically Scotland thrived in the 18th century. Only since 1850 has there been significant population decline. It is important that we understand the reasons for this decline, as only via such self knowledge can we hope to revive the Scottish economy. But that is not possible so long as some seek to create a false narrative of repression and guilt at a time when all the evidence shows that Scotland’s population was booming. The real story is that only after the improvements and clearances did the bulk of people leave Scotland …. and perhaps it is that very Victorian patronising myth of a Scotland filled by the (un)deserving “noble savage” that so many were trying to escape? So dig! Dig to find the real truth of the deserted settlements: a vibrant independent culture with a clan-based culture making Scottish landlords better than most and a country capable of bringing forth some of the greatest minds in history, but a culture subject to the vagaries of the climate from the Bronze age to the 1690s. So dig and expose the truth and expose those who paint Scotland as a victim culture for the political & historical carpet baggers they are.

Illustration Index

Fig 1: Cadet George Armstrong “Autie” Custer, c1859 4 Fig 2: Change in Highland population 1755 to 1790s (Meyer 1987 p.49) Note Anderson (2011) suggests a 6.5% error in Webster’s figures. 6 Fig 3: Inverness Population 1831-1911 7 Fig 4: Caithness Population 1831-1911 7 Fig 5: Sutherland population. Figures are stacked with largest parish lowest so that the top represents the total population for the shire. 7 Fig 6: Long-term population trends in Lochaber (1801-1961) by parishes (Turnock 1967) 8 Fig 7: The distribution of population in the Glen Roy/Glen Spean area (Kilmonivaig parish) in 1851, 1891and 1966. (Turnock 1967) 8 Fig 8: The distribution of population and land use in Knoydart (Glenelg parish) in 1841, 1891 and 1966. (Turnock 1967) 9 Fig 9: Perthshire Population 1831-1911 9 Fig 10: Argyll Population 1831-1911 9 Fig 11: 21 September 1931 12 Fig 12: 29 August 2006 12 Fig 13: Central England Temperature (F) since 1680 with 1690 highlighted in blue.From lamb Fig 1. p. 446 15 Fig 14: Chronological synthesis of the documentary, archaeological and palynological interpretation for Lour (Carter et al 1997) 16 Fig 15: Scottish GDP 1979-2010 at basic prices (Scottish Government) 19 Fig 16: Population Change, Highlands and Islands 1851-2001 (Scot Exec 2005 Chart 4.3) 20 Fig 17: Gaelic Speaker 1755- 2001 (Table amended from MacAulay 1992) 20 Fig 18: Scottish Gaelic Speakers 1755-2001 21 Fig 19: Mel Gibson, Braveheart 22 Fig 20: Scout Movement founder Robert Baden-Powell with Sioux Indian Chief Dr. Charles A. Eastman in Queens’ College, Cambridge, UK, in 1928. 23 Fig 21: Buffalo Bill’s Wild West Date 1890 23 Fig 22: Hand-colored version of Theodor de Bry’s “The true picture of one Pict,” was originally published as an illustration in Thomas Hariot’s 1588 book “A Briefe and True Report of the New Found Land of Virginia.” 24 Fig 23: From Theodor de Bry’s America 1590″A Werowan or great Lorde of Virginia” (detail) engraved by Theodor De Bry after a painting by John White. 24 Fig 24: Macquarrie Costumes of the Clans of Scotland. 1899. The Clans of the Scottish Highlands, (R. R. McIan 1845) 24 Fig 25: James Watt Cottage and Graffitied Steam Engine Cylinder (Canmore) 26

Index of Tables

Table 1: Graphs of population. Figures are stacked with largest parish lowest so that the top represents the total population for the shire. 7 Table 2: settlement abandonment on Lammermuir Hills based on figures from Parry (2008) 11 Table 3: Changes to Calligarry Township (Webb et al 2010) 12

References

Amesbury, M.J., Charman, D.J., Fyfe, R.M., Langdon, P.G. & West, S. (2008) Bronze Age upland settlement decline in southwest England: testing the climate change hypothesis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, pp.87-98. Anderson, M. (2011) Guesses, Estimates and Adjustments: Webster’s 1755 “Census” of Scotland Revisited Again. Journal of Scottish Historical Studies, 31, pp.26-45. Anon Boy Scouts – Formation and Influences, The Challenges from the Twentieth Century On [Internet]. Available from: <http://www.faqs.org/childhood/Bo-Ch/Boy-Scouts.html> [Accessed 28 November 2011a]. Anon braveheart1.bmp [Internet]. Available from: <http://www.sasareport.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/braveheart1.bmp> [Accessed 1 December 2011b]. Anon German Jews during the Holocaust, 1939-1945 [Internet]. Available from: <http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005469> [Accessed 28 November 2011c]. Anon scavenger2.jpg (JPEG Image, 400×519 pixels) – Scaled (76%) [Internet]. Available from: <http://www.nettlesworth.durham.sch.uk/time/victorian/scavenger2.jpg> [Accessed 5 December 2011d]. Anon ScotlandsPlaces – Bo’ness, Kinneil, James Watt’s Cottage [Internet]. Available from: <http://www.scotlandsplaces.gov.uk/search_item/image.php?service=RCAHMS&id=48173&image_id=DP105254> [Accessed 3 December 2011e]. Anon Scout+movement+founder+Robert+Baden-Powell+and+Sioux+Chief+Dr+Eastman+in+Queens’+College,+Cambridge,+uk+in+1928..jpg (image) [Internet]. Available from: <http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_FZid6VnDf_8/Rw-r2itbjpI/AAAAAAAAAKk/Tx1pNkmARIQ/s1600-h/Scout+movement+founder+Robert+Baden-Powell+and+Sioux+Chief+Dr+Eastman+in+Queens%27+College,+Cambridge,+uk+in+1928..jpg> [Accessed 28 November 2011f]. BBC (2004) BBC – Legacies – Immigration and Emigration – Scotland – Highland – The Sutherland Clearances – Article Page 5 [Internet]. Available from: <http://www.bbc.co.uk/legacies/immig_emig/scotland/highland/article_5.shtml> [Accessed 2 December 2011]. Bonsall, C., Macklin, M.G., Anderson, D.E. & Payton, R.W. (2002) Climate Change and the Adoption of Agriculture in North-West Europe. European Journal of Archaeology, 5 (1), pp.9 -23. Caird, J.B. (1964) The making of the Scottish rural landscape. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 80, pp.72-80. Cameron, J.M. (1971) A study of the factors that assisted and directed Scottish emigration to Upper Canada, 1815-1855. Glasgow University. Cameron, J.M. (1972) The Changing Role of the Highland Landlords Relative to Scottish Emigration during the First Half of the Nineteenth Century. In: T. R. Dale & C. on S. Studies eds. Proceedings of the fourth and fifth Colloquia on Scottish Studies, held in March 27 and June 2, 1971 under the auspices of the Interdepartmental Committee on Scottish Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario Canada. Univ. of Guelph, pp.80-1. Carter, S., Tipping, R., Davidson, D., Long, D. & Tyler, A. (1997) A multiproxy approach to the function of postmedieval ridge-and-furrow cultivation in upland northern Britain. The Holocene, 7 (4), pp.447 -456. Cullen, D.K. (2010) Famine in Scotland – the “ill Years” of the 1690s. Edinburgh University Press. Devine, T.M. (1983) Highland Migration to Lowland Scotland, 1760-1860. The Scottish Historical Review, 62 (174), pp.137-149. Devine, T.M. (1979) Temporary Migration and the Scottish Highlands in the Nineteenth Century. The Economic History Review, 32 (3), pp.344-359. Dickens, C. (2009) Short Stories – Volume IV: Hunted Down, The Lamplighter, The Long Voyage, Lying Awake, A Monument of French Folly, … GRIN Verlag oHG. Dixon, P. (2003) CHAMPAGNE COUNTRY: A REVIEW OF MEDIEVAL RURAL SETTLEMENT IN LOWLAND SCOTLAND. In: Sarah Govan ed. MEDIEVAL OR LATER RURAL SETTLEMENT IN SCOTLAND: 10 YEARS ON. Historic Scotland, pp.53-64. Available from: <http://www.molrs.org.uk/downloads/HRSG%20research%20framework%20071108.pdf> [Accessed 1 December 2011]. Dodgshon, R.A. (1993) Strategies of Farming in the Western Highlands and Islands of Scotland Prior to Crofting and the Clearances. The Economic History Review, 46 (4), pp.679-701. Duwe, K.C. (2006) Gaidhlig_Local_Studies_Vol_07_Na_Lochan_Ed_II.pdf (application/pdf Object) [Internet]. Available from: <http://www.linguae-celticae.org/dateien/Gaidhlig_Local_Studies_Vol_07_Na_Lochan_Ed_II.pdf> [Accessed 29 November 2011]. Flinn, M.W. (1977) Comparative Aspects of Irish and Scottish Economic and Social Development, 1600-1900. In: L. M. Cullen & T. C. Smout eds. John Donald Publishers Ltd. Gaskell, P. (1996) Morvern Transformed: A Highland Parish in the Nineteenth Century. New edition. House of Lochar. Gray, M. (1957) Highland Economy, 1750-1850. Oliver & B. Hunter, J. (1997) The Making of the Crofting Community. New edition. John Donald Publishers Ltd. Know, W.W. A HISTORY of the SCOTTISH PEOPLE MIGRATION: SCOTLANDS SHIFTING POPULATION 1840-1940 [Internet]. Available from: <http://www.scran.ac.uk/scotland/pdf/SP2_7migration.pdf> [Accessed 30 November 2011]. Lamb, H. H. (1967) Britain’s Changing Climate. The Geographical Journal, 133 (4), pp.445-466. Lamb, Hubert H. (1982) Climate, History and the Modern World. 2nd ed. Routledge. MacAulay, D. (1992) The Celtic languages. Cambridge University Press. MacPherson, J.J. (1933) The Famine Years in the N.E. 1693, 1700, 1741 & 1782. In: Transactions of the Banffshire Field Club 1932-35. Banffshire Field Club, p.50. Available from: <http://www.banffshirefieldclub.org.uk/> [Accessed 2 December 2011]. McNeil, K. History of the Highland Clearances: a Timeline [Internet]. Available from: <http://nutmeg.easternct.edu/~mcneilk/Clearance_timeline.html> [Accessed 28 November 2011]. Meyer, D. (1987) The Highland Scots of North Carolina, 1732-1776. UNC Press Books. Parry, M.L. (1976) The abandonment of upland settlement in Southern Scotland. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 92, pp.50-60. Pfister, C. (1994) Spatial patterns of climatic change in Europe”. In: B. Frenzel ed. Climatic trends and anomalies in Europe 1675-1715. Stuttgart ;;Jena [etc.], G. Fischer. Prebble, J. (1982) The Highland Clearances. New Ed. Penguin. Richards, E. (1973) Leviathan of Wealth : The Sutherland Fortune in the Industrial Revolution. University of Toronto Press. Richards, E. (2007) The Highland Clearances. 3rd ed. Birlinn Ltd. Richards, E. (2002) The Highland Clearances People, Landlords and Rural Turmoil. First Reprinted. Birlinn. Robertson, R.G. (2001) Rotting face : smallpox and the American Indian. Caxton Press. Rothman, H. & Studies, W.P.C.C. for S. (2003) The culture of tourism, the tourism of culture: selling the past to the present in the American Southwest. UNM Press. Ryder, M.L. (1968) Sheep and the Clearances in the Scottish Highlands: A Biologist’s View. The Agricultural History Review, 16 (2), pp.155-158. Scottish Government (2011a) Shaping the nations future-the history of Scotlands Census [Internet]. Available from: <http://www.scotlandscensus.gov.uk/documents/Shapingthenationsfuture-thehistoryofScotlandsCenus.pdf> [Accessed 29 November 2011]. Scottish Government, S.A.H. (2011b) Key Scottish Environment Statistics 2011 [Internet]. Available from: <http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2011/09/05154117/3> [Accessed 28 November 2011]. Scottish Parliament (2000) Motion: S1M-1004 Highland Clearances. In: Minutes of Proceedings. Available from: <http://archive.scottish.parliament.uk/business/chamber/mop-00/mop-09-27.htm>. Scran SP2_7migration.pdf (application/pdf Object) [Internet]. Available from: <http://www.scran.ac.uk/scotland/pdf/SP2_7migration.pdf> [Accessed 28 November 2011]. SEW File:Benjamin west Death wolfe noble savage.jpg – Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Internet]. Available from: <http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Benjamin_west_Death_wolfe_noble_savage.jpg> [Accessed 28 November 2011]. Sims, G. (1902) EVICTED LONDON [Internet]. Available from: <http://www.victorianlondon.org/houses/slums.htm> [Accessed 30 November 2011]. Sinclair, S.J. (1791) The statistical account of Scotland: Drawn up from the communications of the ministers of the different parishes. W. Creech. Smollett, T. (Tobias) (1824) The Expedition of Humphry Clinker. Available from: <http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2160> [Accessed 28 November 2011]. Svensmark, H. (2000) Cosmic Rays and Earth’s Climate. Space Science Reviews, 93 (1), pp.175-185. Tipping, R., Davies, A., McCulloch, R. & Tisdall, E. (2008) Response to late Bronze Age climate change of farming communities in north east Scotland. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, pp.2379-2386. Turnock, D. (1969) North Morar—the improving movement on a West Highland estate. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 85, pp.17-30. Turnock, D. (1967) Population Studies and Regional Development in West Highland Scotland. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 49 (1), pp.55-68. Walker, S. (2003) AGENTS OF DISPOSSESSION AND ACCULTURATION. EDINBURGH ACCOUNTANTS AND THE HIGHLAND CLEARANCES. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14, pp.813-853. Walton, K. (1952) Climate and famines in North East Scotland. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 68, pp.13-21. Webb, R.H., Turner, R.M. & Boyer, D.E. eds. (2010) Repeat Photography Methods and Applications in the Natural Sciences. Island Press. Available from: <http://new.crofting.org/uploads/news/repeat_photography.pdf> [Accessed 2 December 2011]. Wert, J.D. (1996) Custer: The Controversial Life of George Armstrong Custer. illustrated edition. Simon & Schuster. Wikipedia Aboriginal Tasmanians – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Internet]. Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tasmanian_Aborigine> [Accessed 28 November 2011a]. Wikipedia Battle of the Little Bighorn [Internet]. Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Little_Bighorn> [Accessed 28 November 2011b]. Wikipedia File:Buffalo Bills Wild West Show, 1890.jpg – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Internet]. Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Buffalo_Bills_Wild_West_Show,_1890.jpg> [Accessed 28 November 2011c]. Wikipedia File:George-a-custer west-point.jpg – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Internet]. Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:George-a-custer_west-point.jpg> [Accessed 28 November 2011d]. Wikipedia File:Macquarrie (R. R. McIan).jpg – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Internet]. Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Macquarrie_(R._R._McIan).jpg> [Accessed 28 November 2011e]. Wikipedia George Armstrong Custe [Internet]. Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Armstrong_Custer> [Accessed 28 November 2011f]. Wikipedia Population history of indigenous peoples of the Americas – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Internet]. Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_American_indigenous_peoples#Genocide_debate> [Accessed 28 November 2011g]. William, A. (1877) Notes and sketches illustrative of northern rural life in the eighteenth century. D. Douglas. Available from: <http://www.archive.org/details/notessketchesill00alexuoft> [Accessed 2 December 2011]. Wilson, D.M. & Northcott, H.C. (2008) Dying and Death in Canada. University of Toronto Press. Wood, J.D. (1965) The complicity of climate in the 1816 depression in Dumfriesshire. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 81, pp.5-17.

This entry was posted in General, My Best Articles. Bookmark the permalink.

77 Responses to The Truth about the Highland Clearances

  1. catweazle666 says:

    My wife’s late father – whose family were amongst those displaced – reckoned that the Clearances were the best thing that ever happened to the Scots, because they had to get out into the world and do stuff, instead of extremely low grade subsistence farming.

    Hence the ubiquity of Scottish engineers, for example.

    • I’ve read the Court book of Kirkintilloch. In that you see that similar land changes were occurring in Kirkintilloch around 1700 with areas like “Newlands” being drained and divided up for tenant farmers. As in the Highlands, more than likely some herdsman was “cleared” from the land, but like the Highlands was probably given a house and a tenancy.

      And why were all these sheep needed? It was because the textile towns were booming – largely because people who used to farm the uplands had moved to their nearest town to gain from the growing prosperity of that time.

      It is simply wrong to describe this period of booming economy and population as “genocide”.

      Most people left Scotland between 1900 and 1930, with the big drop in Gaelic speaking between 1900 & 1970

      • catweazle666 says:

        “It is simply wrong to describe this period of booming economy and population as “genocide”. “

        I wasn’t aware I had.

        I simply quoted my wife’s late father, who asserted that his family had been forced to move from a croft by the “Clearances” (his words) and had subsequently become quite successful in a different field altogether, and further, that his family was by no means unique in this respect.

        I have no reason whatsoever to doubt his version of his family’s history.

        How on Earth you manage to deduce from that that I am claiming that “Genocide” occurred is not remotely clear to me.

  2. Neil Craig says:

    Remarkable.
    If the “real clearances” date from 1851 and the lack of establishment of any major urban centres in the west Highlands (I assume the countryside in the central belt also lost population to a similar proportion but it doesn’t matter because the towns grew) then the probable reason looks like the lack of transport infrastructure. You can’t make a good manufacturing centre where there are no good communications – Oban, which is a 19thC creation, being the best the area could do.

    I would, in that light, be interested in seeing how population moved in the islands – this may show the same pattern in a more extreme way. Many of the islands, even out to St Kilda, held significant populations more than 4,000BC, at a time when mainland Scotland was devoid of almost any major settlements. This could happen partly because, due to weather, the islands were not overgrown with forest but also because sea transport was far easier than land, roads being non-existent, yet now St Kilda is uninhabited and Jura has a population of 250, probably less than it had when Troy was built.

    Thus in the “dark ages” the ruler of Orkney and Shetland could make war on more than equal terms with the king of Scots (& may, if Dorothy Dunnit is correct, have been the same person).

    (Which in turn suggests the possible utility of the Scottish Tunnel Project for reversing a real clearance which has taken place not under the rule of lairds but of politicians since 1851.)

    I was unaware of the ignoring of Watt’s birthplace. Reminiscent of how in the 19thC Shakespeare’s house (at the time serving as a butcher shop) was nearly carted off to the US to be a sideshow exhibit, but when this became public the British people were shamed into the protection of his legacy that continues to today. It should be being treated as equivalent.

    • The problem is lack of research – and the reason is the same as climate.

      No academic would get funding for a project that did not show the Scots as a victim of English oppression.

      Ian asked how 9000 (or was it 97%) of all academics could be wrong and this is the answer. A highly politicised academic culture wouldn’t have it any other way.

  3. TinyCO2 says:

    While I’m no student of history, this seems to fit my family history. Departure from Scotland didn’t do them too much harm and while two branches ended up in Canada and Australia, my own line stayed in Scotland until they moved southwest to Cumbria and many are scattered there now. Their fortunes varied from generation to generation as they were either farmers or farm workers depending upon which member of the family frittered the money away or earned it. They certainly all did better than the very distant line that were wiped out by a neighbouring clan.

    My mother’s family seemed to have fared much worse than my father’s line. They were Irish immigrants moving to Lancashire and into the mills and pits.

    It always irks me when anyone suggests that the British pays for past wrongs, as if the majority of our ancestors didn’t have pretty grotty lives at one point or another.

    • My own family emigrated to Australia but returned. My father was director of the rocket tracking range in Woomera. I think they missed family and friends and returned and he got a relatively minor civil service job.

      It was clearly not an easy thing to do. The economic incentive to emigrate was immense, but it must have been very traumatic for those involved. Particularly those from close knit communities who had to leave family and friends at home. There would have been a huge amount of guilt. I think this “clearance” myth comes out of a desire by relatively late (20th century) emigrants – particularly those returning to their “home” trying to find “something” other than what could be construed as “economic greed” for their emigration.

      The problem is that it totally misses the real story – which was a booming Scottish economy – and because we in Scotland have failed to understand that Scotland was booming, let alone how and why in the past, we are unable to understand how to make our economy boom in the future.

      So, sorry. It might be a nice myth for returning Scots, but it has been a wholly destructive narrative in terms of the modern day economy with e.g. the policy of “independence by wind”.

  4. Michael Fry says:

    I am surprised that my book Wild Scots (2005) has escaped your attention.

    Michael Fry

  5. Ian Forrester says:

    Are there any other bits of real science and real history you deny. Seems like once d
    [This is the last warning. You do not come onto my blog to slander people]

  6. Ian Forrester says:

    If you can’t stand the heat you shouldn’t be posting nonsense.

  7. Ian Forrester says:

    Also you should realize that telling the truth about someone is not slandering. If you think I have slandered you there are remedies but I don’t suppose you want the embarrassment that would cause you.

    • I know what my views are. You don’t.

      You are so stupid, that you tell me you have more knowledge of what I believe than I do.

      You don’t.

      I know my own views – they are my personal views – and I am the only person who can judge if your statements are slander.

      If you can’t accept that, then please go away.

      • Ian Forrester says:

        One last comment, you do realize that your views do not line up with reality. You are entitled to your views but not your own facts.

        I do find this comment a bit puzzling:

        No academic would get funding for a project that did not show the Scots as a victim of English oppression.

        Who is claiming that it was the English who orchestrated the clearances? It was the clan chiefs themselves when they had no further use for their clansmen.

  8. Derek Alker says:

    1) Ian is a troll – period. Just get rid of him Mike. I do it now in other groups and the group is always better off for a better atmosphere, even if quieter. Better a little constructive discussion than a whole load of unless (time wasting) “debate” with trolls and pigeons.

    2) Several years ago I attended a presentation in Torridon (Sorry, I can not remember her name, I think it was an East coast Uni thou.). I was on holiday at the time. This was about emigration in the (local) area, and the importance of sheep farming. It was presented that the Napoleonic war meant imports to England of sheep wool / mutton from Australia suffered (to almost nothing) during the conflict, so sheep were farmed in Scotland because wool / mutton / lamb had increased so much in price as Australian imports were failing. Whether that is true or invented I do not know, BUT, it appeared to be the case that rents went up by a factor of ten within a very short period, due to the more profitable sheep farming. This meant that cattle were not as plentiful, and so bracken spread like wild fire as a result of increased sheep farming. Cattle trample and kill off bracken, sheep do not, so bracken invades when sheep are farmed.

    May be incorrectly, I refer to bracken in Scotland as Napoleonic weed, which might be a little true at least. During the Napoleonic war period the highland Scottish landscape changed significantly, and the spreading of bracken is probably the most noticeable visual change.

    3) Sorry, but Scottish history, politics, and independence must include,
    http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/thread-1140.html
    A possible lesson from history – The Darien Scheme.

    • Yes Ian is not making himself look good.

      The main focus of the essay, was trying to understand why the statistics did not match the prevailing “consensus” (i.e. nationalist academic) view. The narrative of “genocide” was just utterly ridiculous. Which meant rather than writing an easy essay from the “consensus”, I ended up having to re-interpret the history from the facts up.

      This obviously left a lot of loose ends and you’ve raised several. However, the main reason I posted it was to show (as it does) that there is a wholesale fiction about this period which is easily discredited by a simple reference to the facts on population and an examination of the accounts.

      And … Ian has admirably demonstrated how difficult these facts are for some to accept.

      In an ideal world, we would clearly have history written from the facts up rather than inventing a “consensus” and then rejecting any facts that don’t fit. So, yes, I would love all the points you raise to be more thoroughly investigated.

      • Derek Alker says:

        Yes, it does appear that winners write history, not the facts necessarily, especially those that, as you note, do not fit the consensus view.

        I have to wonder is the famous ferrox trout in Scottish loches man made as such? Acid rain was a scam, change of vegetation is normally the cause. So, in Scotland large scale planting of coniferous trees in the last century in particular changed the water courses acidity. Lakes (ok, freshwater lochs…) once in mainly deciduous catchments suddenly became mainly coniferous catchments, and therefore acidic / peaty. The trout populations in the lochs crashed, and some became ferrox. Not sure anyone else has ever suggested this, but it does seem a possibility, and possible explanation to me.

        • Derek Alker says:

          Mike you also raise another important point, that history must be viewed “at the time” not from our view point now. It is often substantially different and actions that now appear “wrong” or “unreasonable”, were not seen as such at the time.

          A good example is the insurance fraud that got slavery banned world wide. In short, on one of the slavery ships on the way from Africa to America with a cargo of slaves, way back when, had an outbreak of disease. Most of the cargo died. The trip became unprofitable, so the captain threw the rest of the cargo overboard and returned to London to make an insurance claim for the lost / perished cargo. By chance one of the slaves thrown overboard had managed to hang on to the ships rudder and none of the ships crew had noticed. When the ship docked in London, as soon as the rope hit the quayside, the slave was a free man, because slavery had already been abolished in England / Britain. The slave was rescued, and would have simply lived out his life in Britain. However, the insurance company called him as a witness in the trial in regards of the fraudulent insurance claim for the lost cargo. The media got hold of the story, not the insurance claim and the resulting public outcry got slavery banned world wide. It would not have happened if slavery had not already been banned in Britain, way before most of the rest of the world was still using slavery as all civilizations had done previously.

          I have to wonder did these two events, the Darien scheme, and the cargo fraud have a distinct impact on those drawing up, or seeing a need for, the constitution? Many of the intrepid Scots of the failed Darien scheme ended up in America at the time. The highland clearances, to my mind, are related to, and played a significant part in global human history. They were and are far more important than a merely local depopulation, whether it be by greedy landlords, or the usual rural to urban migrations that occur in almost all developing countries.

          Certainly there is a period of history up to 1750 that is not often covered these days, yet out of it came the American constitution. If that did not change the course of human history and development, what did? May be there was a lot happening back then that now does not fit with the consensus view, but as lessons from history go, there are some damned big ones back then that seemed to have spurred the founding fathers to write the constitution, and may have given cause for the highland clearances, at least in part. Yet today, they are little mentioned!

          • The issue of slavery is interesting. I used to be incredulous that anyone could justify slavery. But then I started reading Roman accounts of how they dealt with unwanted pregnancy. Today we “murder” inside the womb. In Roman times they did not have the same technology and instead “murdered” by placing children on the “exposure ground”.

            The reality was that Roman’s were arguably more humane – because a parent – forced to get rid of a child, would hope that someone would pick up the child from the exposure ground and their life would be saved.

            In other words, the most socially responsible people in Roman life would actively support slavery because it saved the lives of Roman citizens who otherwise would have been left to die. Owning a slave could be seen as the most responsible thing a person could do because it saved the lives of young children. It also meant that any Roman citizen might have a brother or a sister who was a slave.

            This clearly didn’t apply with African slaves – but perhaps the intermixing of DNA so that the distinction became less clear, might also explain the changing perception of slavery.

          • Neil Craig says:

            I suspect the present age’s taste for genocide & ethnic cleansing owes a lot to the uneconomic nature of slavery today. If you aren’t willing to have someone as a fellow citizen and can’t usefully enslave them then the alternatives are limited.

            The enslavement of Africans in America was prevalent only in those areas where malaria was equally so (ie south of Mason Dixon). Bondage was also common among Europeans – they signed to several years bondage to pay their passage. Such contracts were also bought and sold but records show that the price of a slave’s contract was usually higher than that of an equivalent European. The conclusion being that life expectancy among Europeans in malarial areas was less than that of Africans and the work they could do, considerably less.

            Sometimes historical oppression is not as clear cut as appears and judging one group by modern standards, while not doing so with others is unlikely to produce a factual conclusion – but as Ian has demonstrated, is useful if factual is not the objective,

  9. Pingback: Found: missing heat – but I’m leaving academics in the cold. | ScottishSceptic

  10. Gary Brindle says:

    Fascinating account of events which I have pondered about. I recently read about the detailed planning which was carried out by landowners principally the Duke of Sutherland and the amount of his own wealth invested to improve the potential of his land in NE Scotland. He was intent on improving the lives of those residents and in turn increasing his yield.He had studies which predicted how many the land could support.
    Also enjoyed your account of the Romans in Scotland, I have some aerial photography of a discovery near Elgin which is not an any lists and deserves investigation.I will forward the pics if you send me an email address.My aerial photo job takes me all over North Scotland and helps with my historical learning.

  11. Sam McComb says:

    Mike

    One of your sources – Professor Tom Devine – says clearly that there were racist attitudes towards the Gaels and that the forced emigrations during the potato famine period would now be regarded as ethnic cleansing.. See “To the Ends of the Earth”; chapter “Human Selection and Enforced Exile” by T.M. Devine

    Sam McComb

    • When a car is not working, it is often difficult to say why it isn’t working only that it cannot move anywhere.

      Likewise with the “clearances”. The narrative of the “clearances” does not fit the historical facts of rising population, lack of evidence for deaths and the general altruistic nature of many (but not all land-lords).

      As such – just as the car will not work – so the narrative of “ethnic cleansing” doesn’t work.

      But just as when the car “doesn’t work”, it doesn’t mean each and every bit of the car has simultaneously failed, so whilst the overall narrative of the clearances is unequivocally false, there may be parts of it that are largely or even completely true.

      The reason I put this essay on line, was to show that there are parts of Scottish history which are clearly false – at least in their public portrayal.

      The questions which should now be asked are these:

      1. How did we come a position where an event that is in most Scottish history books of the period (perhaps all?), portrayed as wholesale removal of a group from the highlands, clearly did not occur.
      2. What if anything in these events is true, and more importantly, how much is false
      3. How far does this misportrayal of Scottish history extend?
      E.g. I have studied the “Kelts” in great detail (there isn’t a lot of raw data – so that isn’t as great an exercise as you would imagine). There is nothing at all to link the Kelts to Scotland, Ireland or Wales. The facts are clear: this is a totally bogus claim with no substance in fact.
      4. Assuming the above happens (which given my experience in other areas looks unlikely) how do we stop it happening again.

  12. sam mccomb says:

    your website does not allow for lengthy posts. Devine: ” …from 1841 to 1861` many west Highland parishes experienced an unprecedented fall in population,principally through emigration….”by 1855..virtually reached the target of 2500 through a combination of threats of eviction, confiscation of cattle stocks and suspension of famine relief” …”The highly experienced official…Sir Edward Pine Coffin who had been involved in famine relief in mexico and Ireland…condemned the landed classes for seeking to bring about “the extermination of the population” ..eviction would lead to “the enforced depopulation of the Highlands.”
    By 1850 Trevelyan prposed to “emigrate” 30,000 to 40,000 of the people to rid the land of the celts. The exodus would allow for the settlement of a racially superior people of Teutonic stock..”

    Now, care was taken over whom to expel. Those behind in rent went, so did the old, the sick and the dying.

    • Devine: “many” … and on what basis is he saying this? Is this a statement of what he beleives will have happened – without any evidence to back it up, or has he checked the parish records?

      The simple fact is that if there had been a genocide, this would have shown in the census data. It did not, so the hard facts do not appear to fit this narrative.

      The question I am asking is “why?” Why isn’t the history built on the facts and instead appears to be built on what people want the facts to be. And if people want to portray a picture of genocide rather than what the facts show, this more or less proves the original assertion that I made that forced me to publish this essay. AN AWFUL LOT OF SCOTTISH HISTORY IGNORES THE FACTS AND IS JUST MADE UP.

      • “Many” is a weasel word. It can mean, and may well be taken to mean the large majority, which is what would be needed for a general “Highland” Clearance. It can also be 1,2,3,4,5, many.

        It may well be that Devine knows which. It may also be that if he said so his government job. TV appearances and newspaper articles would be at risk. Think David Bellamy.

        • And it often means “most of my colleagues (who have also made money from books like this) would not disagree.”

          But I suspect all it means in this case, is that some new-comer church minister brought in from London was writing a letter pleading for more money “for the parish” on the basis that there are so many poor people who need help.

          In other words, a rich altruistic land owners, wanting to help their local kinsmen, brings in an educated person who then writes a pleading letter for “the poor who are dying” (something hardly unique before penicillin) which much later some academic with a grudge against the “injustice” against Scotland takes out of context and writes up as a horrible injustice done to the “poor” who the landowners were more than willing to help.

  13. Ben Clinch says:

    Very interesting to know how this ‘other’ view of Scottish rural history is treated in the very live land reform debate, where the clearances are regularly cited in discussion.

    • Scottish-Sceptic says:

      It was supposed to be a very quick essay for an archaeological course – one which I only chose because all the others on similar non-archaeological subjects were so dull and I thought this would be a very quick essay regurgitating the terrible genocide of highlanders.

      But I made the mistake of trying to back up my assertions with actual data and very soon found that the population of the highlands had actually risen during this so called “clearances” and I was unable to find anything much at all to substantiate violence intimidation or anything similar on a widespread scale. In fact I was surprised by find the highland land owners were bringing in ministers and school teachers.

      I also know from my own research that in the 1690s up to a quarter of Scotland’s population died from a famine in a cold-wet period and I found the majority of the depopulation occurred in the 20th century.

      In short, I feel the “highland clearances” are totally blown out of proportion and far worse events are completely ignored – and all apparently to fit a modern day political need to create a persecution myth.

      • Macshimidh says:

        Well, where to start.

        How about with your use of the word “clearances”.

        Are you aware that there is no implication of population reduction in Clearance, and indeed the purpose was frequently to keep people on the land, but re-locate them?

        That is something of a rhetorical question, of course.

        Did you pass your course?

        • Scottish-Sceptic says:

          It was the SNP in the Scottish parliament that suggested it was a genocide:

          “In other countries, the genocide and ethnic cleansing that has taken place, against the Indians in America and the Aborigines in Australia, was acknowledged long ago. Today, the time to acknowledge what happened to those who were cleared from the Highlands has come.” (Fergus Ewing (SNP))

          • Macshimidh says:

            The fact that somebody else is also wrong is not a defence which will earn you any credit.

            Clearance led to emigration, in time – due mainly to the poor quality of the land where people were re-settled, and the breaking up of traditional communities.

            There certainly was an element of ‘ethnic cleansing’ to many ‘coerced emigrations’ noted recently by Tom Devine amongst other researchers of the period.

            A 1993 United Nations Commission defined ‘ethnic cleansing’ specifically as, “the planned deliberate removal from a specific territory, persons of a particular ethnic group, by force or intimidation, in order to render that area ethnically homogenous.”

          • Scottish-Sceptic says:

            The Landlord on St.Kilda begged the islanders not to emigrate. I have come across no evidence to support the a charge of “ethnic cleansing” and the increase in population in the highlands during this period clearly indicates that no such event occurred in that “territory”. Instead it appears to be part of the standard agricultural revolution that occurred throughout Britain which no one except those with a political axe could attribute to ethnicity.

          • Macshimidh says:

            Ha!

            It seems I can’t reply to your last point. Technical reasons, no doubt.

            You may not have found the evidence, but Tom Devine did (and he wasn’t grinding a political axe, he’s a pretty trustworthy historian.) You need to consider the period following the intial clearance and the congestion which was created.

            There is plentiful evidence of an ethnic element to the policies of the time, both governmental and private.

            The population increased slightly initially because there was an underlying increase pan-europe at this time. You knew that, right?
            This masked the inital outflow, as did the inflow of people brought in from elsewhere as part of the new sheep runs.

  14. John Smith says:

    Scottish
    thought provoking paper
    agree that the current fashion to equate every social and cultural conflict to “genocide” or “racism” is ridiculous
    actually scary
    interesting that you say there was little or no displacement prior to 1830
    almost certain my alleged ancestors arrived in North Carolina considerably earlier
    but have nothing to dispute your evidence
    the “noble savage” theme is quite strong here in US and I must admit in my own psyche
    a former US NAVSEC James Webb, possible presidential candidate, has written a book
    “Born Fighting: the Scots-Irish Influence in America”
    also, this theme is strong among non-urban mostly conservative elements
    I live walking distance from an impressive statue of Wallace (no kilt, maile, surcoat, heater, bascinet, claymore held high)
    I would also say that the alleged highland side of my family exhibits “clannish and mafioso” characteristics that are not admirable, not to mention serious red hair if that stereotype is true
    It is my impression that alarmist idealize primitive or “lost” notions of historic noble cultures and lifestyles as well
    thanks
    fun new thing for me to learn about
    I had no idea that you had written on this subject

  15. li says:

    It’s clear the author is an archaeologist! The initial assumptions are strawmen. (Has intercontinental migration ever been the largest component of displacement, anywhere? ‘Inevitable’ population falls during genocides, e.g.s please? No, it’s *not* obvious.) The rest is primarily simple (but hardly unbiased) ignorance excused with references. Don’t call this ‘research’. History is not for emotive amateurs with a pseud’s definition of ‘scepticism’. This article is an embarrassment, to its author, and the university system. (It wouldn’t last a day on Wikipedia.) Best used as a how-not-to of schoolboy errors, but the real shame is how *much* work wasted on so little logical thought! And that only in the wasp trad would such patent bunkum be met with such self-congratulatory fawning.

    • Scottish-Sceptic says:

      You seem to have missed the fact that:
      1. The “highland clearances” were likened to a genocide by modern Scottish polticians
      2. The facts show a population increase in the highlands during the period of this supposed genocide.

      Instead the facts show the main population decrease in the highlands was in the 20th century.

      Like it or not, these are the facts.

    • Biorag says:

      Agreed. I too am skeptical of the author’s intent and distilling of “facts”. Using mainly census figures from unreliable at best sources, we are all supposed to understand that we’ve been duped, that an entire people’s history and experience is only a myth. That our families’ oral histories are all lies designed to elicit sympathy and romantic ideals of what really were nothing but a bunch of squatters given the heave-ho. And in the few “facts” he does acknowledge, well it’s all okay because it was for economic gain. Pfft.

      • The data is the best we have available. It was compiled by researchers looking at records from parishes and whilst not as good as a modern census, it is as good as we will get for the period.

        The data shows the Highland population increased during the “clearances” and decreased at either side in the 1690s & 1900s. Moreover those cleared appeared for the most part to have been resettled within the same estates or emigrated voluntarily.

        There is only one record of a death – that case went to a jury trial and the jury found them not guilty. But obviously during 150 years there would be many different events some of good landlords some of bad. And if you had a will, you could easily pick and chose either good or bad to create a biased narrative. But that cannot change the facts that the Highlands were flourishing with population growth during the supposed “clearances”. So, whether or not you like it – there is almost nothing at all to support the narrative as presented by those with a political agenda like the SNP of a “mass genocide”.

        • Biorag says:

          The contempt you hold for the topic (and maybe even the Gaels themselves) is beyond obvious in your essay. That you have your own political agenda to what you proposed as an academic obligation is not surprising.

          It remains my opinion that your entire theory revolves around a baseline that is inaccurate – birth and baptism records from the 18th century.

          My own family emigrated to Cape Breton from South Uist – after being displaced from their ancestral grounds to the other side of the island where 3 blades of grass constituted a meadow. Did they emigrate “voluntarily”? Yes, considering the alternative was further starvation and death. Strange how you don’t take records of displacement into account and the aftermath to augment your population stats.

          Genocide, as a word, is a relatively new invention and encompasses much more than an outright massacre; it is also accomplished by eliminating a people’s language, customs, culture and economic base and forcibly assimilate them to the dominant identity.

          The Clearances are not defined by one singular moment in history but encompass a collection of events and occurrences over a period of time. No acknowledged genocide is declared because of one isolated event, it is almost always a drawn-out process. Even known genocides that continue to be denied (the Armenians come to mind) had a lead-up to mass killings and a resulting aftermath. Cultural genocides (like I am witness to here with our indigenous people) are slow, deliberate affairs meant to remove a collective identity and heritage over a few generations. They can be surprisingly effective.

          The Act of Proscription and the Heritable Jurisdictions Act had a purpose, to decimate the Mafiosa, (as you so objectively call it) and dilute the dominant highland culture into oblivion. The reasons for it are easily discernible – politics, power, money – a trinity of greed. The established clan functioning stood in the way of that trinity and posed a continued potential threat to Protestant rule.

          Is genocide an accurate portrayal of the Clearances? By definition, yes. By practice, yes. Whether you like it or not. It can’t be easy to accept that civilized nations like yours enacted such despicable acts on her own people, but they did. There are witnessed accounts recorded everywhere, if one chooses to look for them. But alas, they would not uphold your theory so they may as well be non-existent or dismissed as fabricated myths.
          Beannachd leibh

          • Scottish-Sceptic says:

            I am presenting the facts showing that population did not decline and that even a small amount of research shows the whole narrative of genocide to be false.

            This does not mean Scotland had its fair share of land-lord evictions or bad land-lords. But the evidence cannot in anyway support a narrative of genocide.

            The Gaels (a name invented in the 18th century from Gàidheal and reduced by an assumed and false back-etymology from gaul) are a race linked to the Dalriada who no one even remotely suggested were Celts until the 18th century. My own research suggests the Gaels are probably indigenous to the West coast in the Gaelic speaking areas very likely settling before the Roman invasion.

            So, it would seem the Gaels lived in relative peace and harmony with the non-gaels – at least there’s no evidence of genocidal massacres of incoming Gaels, nor of Gaels being pushed back from the east coast.

            This fits in with the general pattern now emerging in British archaeology: that the old ideas of “ethnic cleansing” are invalid and fictions of the fertile imagination of previous generations of scholars.

    • Scottish-Sceptic says:

      I was doing an archaeology course and we were set an essay and none of the subjects looked interesting, but I though “highland clearances — that’s an easy one, they’ll be lots of stuff I can just rip off and wang bang thankyou mam … I won’t have to waste my time on it”.

      Then … because I did science … and I like to back up what I’m saying with statistics, I went to look for the data showing a massive population decline in the Highlands. Instead I found a population INCREASE. So, then I tried to “Prove” the terrible deed, by looking for all the people who had been killed. And the more I looked for facts the less I found. Indeed, by the end I felt the main reason anyone talks about “highland clearances”, is because the highland landowners were more concerned for their tenants, and that the agricultural revolution which occurred in both England and Scotland, was delayed in Scotland by the more compassionate land-owners and clan structure.

      But unfortunately when the agricultural revolution did finally arrive, the culture of society had changed, with a lot of “do-gooders” who were quite happy to falsely denigrate the Scottish landowners when they finally got around to the = much needed reform of Highland agriculture.

  16. Paul Gregory. says:

    Just thought I would add to that, what I have written there is common knowledge, it took a lot of piecing together.
    You are certainly along the right lines Scottish sceptic. The SNP is a fraudulent organisation empowered by convincing the electorate that the ancestors of the electorate were opposed to British governance … This is not true.

    Catholics and presbyterians killed each other, Catholics wanted clan rule, presbyterians wanted the lords in power… The SNP had not happened yet.
    In Scotland today you say nice things about the SNP or are likely to be attacked by youths on drugs.
    The reason they are in power and s intimidation and turning a blind eye to crime.
    Criminals impose the SNP, prisons are 100% SNP territory, the strongest areas of support are the high crime areas.

    Does the SNP empower the supply of drugs?

  17. Paul Gregory. says:

    Just fomenting so I can tick the email me of new posts bit if there is one.

    Rats that’s what the clearances were about… Read the link.

  18. Paul Gregory. says:

    And another thing you might be interested in …

    King Arthur, smelted iron from stone and made weapons such as swords. Not a lot of people know that, a few more do now.

    How history can be changed to myth.

    • Scottish-Sceptic says:

      You are referring to the idea some academic had that drawing a sword from a stone is rather like smelting. And whilst superficially attractive, I think it is unlikely to be the origin of the story as the Arthur story contains no mention of any blacksmithing or anything else one would expect.

      Myths like this can develop when old technology becomes redundant, so that the inclusion of the “ancient” technology is no longer relevant to the story and so gets dropped or replaced. So, e.g. a story involving the backward-forward motion of an early corn grinder, might drop the corn grinder when the predominant method because a circular rotated quern stone and replace it with something else to explain the necessary “back-forward” motion.

      So … the original story might be … one day the woman had a particularly large quantity of corn to grind and becoming tired she asked for help for “Thornocator”. Because it was a hot day …. he helped push and pull the grind stone … husband comes out kills them both.

      If the story is popular, and last beyond the change to the quern stone, perhaps “kneading the bread”, might replace grinding corn as the “cause” of the unfortunate incident.

  19. Paul Gregory. says:

    As swords are made from iron, perhaps steel, and iron is made by smelting iron ore (stone) it seems logical that he smelted iron ore and made a sword.

  20. tua_nua says:

    ScottishSceptic, thank you for the clearest outline of “the clearances” that I have seen. I’d just like to remark that many Scottish people give themselves a very bad reputation internationally leaning on myths. I’m Irish, and one can easily imagine the Big Yawn when this begins (cue the British, mostly Scottish, plantation of Ulster). It’s like the Dutch I met recently who had afrikanner relatives being victimised by Germany, the Austrians play the same card, and let’s not even talk about my country ;)

    Reading your article, it’s great to know that Scotland and Scottish people can and regularly do engage in enlightening and groundbreaking debate. I’ve learned a lot, thank you !

    • The real truth is that most people left Scotland of their own volition in the 1960s and 70s – largely as a consequence of the poor economic conditions in Scotland relative to places like America. As a result, Scotland was a “victim” but not of history but instead relatively modern government policy which concentrated wealth in the industrial areas favoured by the SE and neglected or (as per CO2 policy) actively destroyed heavy industry that tended to dominate in the north of England and Scotland.

      The real history of Scotland is of a nation that did far more than its fair share to create the modern industrial world – a heritage which has then ironically been attacked and even just obliterated from the landscape by an insane new generation of politicians that try to justify anti-English sentiment by portraying Scotland as a Victim nation.

      The truth seems to me to be of a highland population whose leaders were MORE ALTRUISTIC than most in the 1600s-1700s with the ironic consequence that the highlands were held back from the effects of the agricultural revolution (which turfed Englanders and lowlanders off the land). And so when this change did eventually come, it was at a time when the change had already been forgotten elsewhere – and in the glare of the new publishing media.

      In other words – it’s probably pretty typical of any nation! Internal squabbles, etc.

  21. Douglas Archibald says:

    Good work man, i was going to include the clearances i heard about in a speech about my motherland. Now I’m going to leave it out, pretty typical though academics will lie about anything, fuckers.

  22. David Webster says:

    Thankyou for the long and interesting perspective, I enjoyed the different perspective from the mainstream thought. Although we will never know the true accuracy of anything in the past ofc

    However, my big qualm, you used the population increases in certain areas as evidence that significant clearnaces didnt take place.

    This simply would not stand up to scientific rigour such as in a PhD viva because in these same areas we also see a rise in poor Irish migrants who fled the Irish ‘famine’…and I highlight famine gingerly as there was adequate food production in Ireland at the time 1840s -1850s just badly distributed and curtailed to mainland British markets.

    However I digress heavily…..but therein lies the point….we must be careful to label things as not happening with circumstansial evidence of absolute population numbers, we need a much more detailed breakdown of figures

    Thanks for the read anyway :) Peace

    • Scottish-Sceptic says:

      Thanks David. What I find astounding is that the evidence I cite is readily available as it was originally a class essay intended to take no more than a week, which then took around three weeks because I found the evidence supported the non-orthodox views.

      You are quite right we need more detail, but the evidence does not fit the narrative of a “genocide” which is how it was portrayed in the Scottish parliament.

      Like you I like to back up what I write with evidence – which is what originally caused me to look for evidence in the population statistics and also tried to find evidence of named people dying.

      What I remember being most difficult to square with the narrative of genocide, is that many of the accounts of “atrocities” come from ministers brought in by landowners to attend the religious needs of their tenants. This strongly suggests that the intention of the landowners were benevolent (at least by the standards at the time, they may well have felt they were behaving far better to their tenants than the social standards of their peers dictated).

      • Macshimidh says:

        Uhm, I think you should read that comment again.

        In fact, I think you should read everything else again, too :-)

        • Scottish-Sceptic says:

          Unlike you, I started with the belief that the narrative of genocide was correct – but when I went to check I found it was impossible to square it with the evidence which seemed to show most Scottish landlords acting in an exemplary way for the period.

          In the one state which is often quoted, most people were either rehomed in the estate or left voluntarily to go abroad. The main evidence of events were from Churchmen and teachers usually brought in by the land-owners at their own expense and for the benefit of their tenants.

          I’m not trying to say what happened would be acceptable now, but I am saying that as far as I could see the accusations of genocide were lies, the statements of mass atrocities were groundless and I’m sick to death of people like you trying to prove some kind of conspiracy theory which the evidence does not support.

          However, if you can provide specific evidence from the period which shows anything even smacking of “genocide” I would be prepared to read it – however given that I could only find one death – which went to court and the defendent was let off – I think you are blowing hot air.

          As for population – one death and a “not guilty” verdict and a growing population is not evidence for genocide.

          And you do know that the Scottish population was recovering from the 1690s famine – or don’t they teach you about that at school?

          • Macshimidh says:

            As I’ve stated quite clearly, the fact that other people have made overblown statements about the clearances is neither here nor there.

            Let’s focus on some of your assertions:

            “The truth is that as a region, there were no highland clearances before the mid 19th century”

            “Much of the uplands of Scotland have always been a wilderness”

            “the impact on the population was benign if not beneficial”

            “the landlords showed incredible care for their tenants and concern for their welfare”

            “The life in a factory was far better than the dirty grimy countryside”

            “perhaps it is that very Victorian patronising myth of a Scotland filled by the (un)deserving “noble savage” that so many were trying to escape?”

            I think, on the whole that if either of us is trying to “prove some sort of theory” – It’s you.

            Well, and Michael Fry :-)

        • Scottish-Sceptic says:

          The evidence of population increase is quite clear. The lack of any deaths associated with the clearances is clear. The fact many people left of their own free will is clear. And it is becoming very clear that you don’t have any evidence to back up your viewpoint.

  23. way too long to summerise

  24. Louis Cook says:

    SIR, This article “The Truth about the Highland Clearances” is very enlightening, however, your reference to the Australian Aborigines is generally not true. The indigenous population are far better off than they would have been under any other regime. The Australian Government has spent $billions over many years to support them but they still complain it is not enough. I will not labor the point further.
    The reference to the Jewish treatment by Hitler is equally suspect … the ‘holocaust’ never happened but to say that can get you in deep shit! It will not be debated in a rational manner. When the ‘sacred cow’ brings in much ‘moola’ then it must be protected. Being ‘sorry’ appears to be a world-wide phenomena promoted by socialists and other left-wing ideologues. You have done well!

    • Scottish-Sceptic says:

      That the Aborigines were better off under British rule, is not the same as saying they were not mistreated by today’s standards. And when it becomes illegal to carry out historical investigation, it almost certainly means the official line is so flimsy that it cannot be supported by the evidence.

      • whatever says:

        Tolerating a crime in my book(and courts thinks the same) is considered a crime, so that is why I asked the question.

        If you have not thought through about different aspects of touching sensitive subjects, you should have avoided posting this subject at all, if you don’t have clear policies on how to deal with people, who are pushing your agenda a bit too much.

    • whatever says:

      Please – not this sh!t, that holocaust never happened, because I have to deal with anxiety driven females in my family, that has given their worries from generation to generation only because their ancestors as children during the WW2 had to live with fear, that they wold be slaughtered(just like their father) – along with people who knew about their(mixed) jew descendancy and gave shelter. And they are considered lucky, because they survived…

      There is a BIG problem with Australian aborigenes and what Australia did to them in 1970s and before, when it had assimilation policy towards aborigenes, where children were taken from parents and also sterilization was used, just like nazis did to jews. Please learn some history, before bringing up ANY of these topics. Let’s not feed old myths, that are proven wrong many times – it is just stupid, dude.

  25. Pingback: Perpetuating some myths of the Highland Clearances | Roddy Macleod's Blog

  26. Pingback: SNP: liars & economically insane. | Scottish Sceptic

  27. Pingback: SNP: Liars and economically insane!

  28. whatever says:

    There are lies, big lies and statistics… the devil is in the details – getting interpretation from statistics IMHO is form of art – and I have seen too many pictures, that differ from source, so pardon my scepticism.

    Despite the mainstream in comments, I actually have some problem with this article, because Russian empire did russification in similar fashion towards nonrussian etnicities – and some aspects of these actions were genocide, just like setling scots and english in Ireland during clearings. Somehow this whole article missed this ethnicide part of british history… that and also maybe the fact, that gaelic was prohibited during those clearings up till there was actualy no one to speak it? Also, note that most of people who migrated and were forcibly settled to colonies during these times had influx of minorities of British Islands- welsh, irish, and gaelic scots among others… that is why there were gaelic and even welsh speakers, who preserved their language in colonies.

    I come from countryside folks, who, just like scots started to dwell in towns and cities around the same time(~200 years ago), when gaels came to Glasgow. Unlike gaels, they retained their language, because in countryside it was common to have 10+ children, so they could afford to lose some of them to towns, where most often they lost their identity, but in the end – because countryside was populated by my folks, they won the demographic battle. Unfortunatelly, nowadays there are some very unpleasant similarities going on, that gaelic people went through some time ago… so, you can feel why I don’t buy this article, when you are pointing out that there was in fact a rise in population in towns… while countryside was essentially dead.

    PS Pardon my english. To be fair – I don’t really care about it anymore, which is kinda sad. Yeah, english was in power thanks to post WW2 US – not UK, so with the decline of US(thanks Obama!), I would rather plan ahead for next language that will be used in science and it won’t be english, so why care… so, undoing english to local british is the only next best thing left.

    • Scottish-Sceptic says:

      I was prepared to accept the genocide narrative until I tried to find even one named person to back it up. And the reason I found them was because the incident went to court and was tried. It’s just impossible to sustain a narrative of genocide when the only death went through the due legal process. You’ll also note that despite being here several years and lots of hostile comments, not one person has listed any additional death or provided evidence of instances where people died.

      In other words this “genocide” is fake history.

      • whatever says:

        I’ve stumbled upon this post recently – not years ago. I don’t see there any hostile coments… must be your mindslip, as you clearly are pushing left agenda, but mentioning trend was quite opposite of what I meant – what I meant was friendly bashing of someone who can’t defend, living or the best targets of them all – dead, because they can’t fight back. Look, you are not inventing anything new here – Soviet Russia had the best courts, that bashed dead people(including people, that helped to create it), but you don’t learn from examples of other people, do you…

        I’m kinda curious – are you refering to courts that were in 18th-19th century? But…genocide is very recent development and could you be more specific – to what legal process of evidence, regarding genocide(that is 20th century term in current definition) from 18th century courts are you refering?

        Genocide in a strict term would mean that british intended to exterminate gaels by killing them – that is not true. Though, in more modern terms – it is enough to classify genocide against people only by intent to destroy and that means – intent to erase their culture and identity and that is the case of clearings. In a narrow view, people, who issued orders about evictions, executed them and implemented sheep-based economic did not had to follow the genocidial thought about erasing gaels, but Scotland was part of British empire and I am repeating again, but wasn’t clearings just part of more global setting?

        Extermination is just part of spectrum of actions that can be used to target ethnicity with intent to destroy it. There are some more: forced migrations, assimilation and discrimination. Are you actually stating that British empire directly or nondirectly did not do any of those actions against groups of people(one of them gaelic speaking scots)?

        If you feel, that you still have to prove that this was fake “genocide”, could you be more specific and define what exatly was in your mind, when you refered to real genocide. So is Holocaust still considered in your real genocide list? Or let me be more specific, as the only answer that matters about this genocide towards gaelic people(I personally see it interconnected, as somehow poeple who deny one are denying all of them or making fake ones) topic is:

        IS HOLOCAUST BY NAZI GERMANY TOWARDS JEWISH PEOPLE REAL?

  29. Pingback: Itinerary: Scotland 2017 | gchaid

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>